Search for: "HAIR v. STATE"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2016, 4:35 am
Commentary on Monday’s ruling in Encino Motorcars v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 6:25 am
In 2012, the Court of Appeals said in McElwee v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:58 am
The Court of Appeals rules that the search that produced narcotics was illegal.The case is United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 6:54 am
CAT View4485523 ELITE YIELD SOLUTIONS View4480280 TRU-FLEX View4482674 WELLPOINT View4480770 LMAX View4480713 NOTRE DAME FEDERAL CREDIT UNION View4480697 FINDERS KEEPERS VENDOR OUTLET MALL View4480686 LEADMAX View4480672 HETSCO View4480583 THE IUSM SAFETY STORE View4480582 THE SAFETY STORE AT RILEY HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN View4480404 NOVELTYMINTS View4482805 CRIMSON GUARD View4480216 HAIR HUGGERS View4480198 RCMA View4480156 NO MORE EXCUSES View4480109 E&A… [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 6:24 am
Zall v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm
Instead, it sent an undercover reporter to Dolly’s Hair, Nails and Beauty equipped with a hidden camera to record a beauty session with Hindley. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:24 pm
Throwing out the convictions of Robert Simels’ associate for witness tampering among other charges, EDNY Judge Gleeson found in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 7:08 am
Plaintiff, a Taino Indian, claims that he was wrongly placed on an out of state transfer list that resulted in his transfer to a Virginia state prison where he was made to shave and get a hair cut even though he had religious exemption in Pennsylvania.In Golosow v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:10 am
In a devastating passage, the Bar notes that Nifong misread a Supreme Court decision—United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm
Lumber Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 12:58 pm
Cos. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
In Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:18 pm
The case is Chanel Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
In Florence v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
In state courts, gatekeeping is a very uneven process. [read post]
16 May 2012, 6:03 am
Guido v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:02 pm
In a decision that perhaps requires a chalkboard and a couple readings to fully grasp, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has held that §203(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") does not preempt state law that lacks an equivalent exception.In Spoerle v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
And in Holt, it was the Arkansas Department of Correction’s facial hair policy rather than a state statute that led to the conflict. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
See also United States v. [read post]
