Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,076
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2014, 1:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 4:21 am
The post Case Comment: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 39 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 1:05 pm
State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310, …[d]ue process requires that a defendant be haled into court in a forum State based on his own affiliation with the State, not based on the random, fortuitous, or attenuated contacts he makes by interacting with other persons affiliated with the State. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 7:46 pm
Hale v Ward County, 848 N.W. 2d 245 (ND 6/24/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Nuisance [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 6:55 am
Corp. et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am
The reason that Parliament was wrong was set out in the case of MacDonald v Fernandez where no less a personage than Hale LJ (as she then was) held that an s21 notice was not a notice to quit and hence that the s21 regime fell outside the common law notice to quit regime. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:50 am
The Hales were owners of a house on agricultural land about one mile southeast of a shooting range in Ward County, which is used to train local, state, and federal law enforcement officers. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm
Therefore, Viatek has not stated a claim for unfair competition under the Lanham Act and this counterclaim is dismissed. * Sussman-Automatic Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:00 am
Indeed Lady Hale identified a number of judgments which she believes benefitted from the availability of her female perspective (including the case of Parkinson v St James and Seacroft University Hospital NHS Trust, which concerned “the damage done to a woman by an unwanted pregnancy”, or the case of Stack v Dowden, a famous case concerning joint ownership of a family home). [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
Baroness Hale gave the leading speech, with which the other members of the Appellate Committee agreed. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm
On 18 June 2014 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:48 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In the matter of American Petroleum Institute v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 1:26 am
Baroness Hale in Birmingham CC v Ali [2009] UKHL 36 – a case which, imho, can be made to say what you want it to say – said at [65], “There may come a case in which we should re-examine the circumstances in which a finding of intentional homelessness ceases to colour all future decisions under the Act but there is no need for us to do so now”. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:31 am
The ECtHR Chamber has delivered its decision in McDonald v UK. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am
RT: nonidentical state laws—you can’t enforce the FDCA but you can enforce state laws identical to those of the FDCA. [read post]
