Search for: "HALLIBURTON COMPANY" Results 541 - 560 of 820
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2011, 10:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
Eisenhofer expressed the view that the Halliburton case is "the big case of the Supreme Court term. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:27 pm
House Democrats, Halliburton Co. and Baker Hughes' BJ Services are among 12 oil and gas companies using diesel fuel in hydraulic fracturing, potentially violating the law. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am by Kevin LaCroix
We also wanted to provide a template for other companies engaged in similar behavior. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:30 am by Mara Hatfield
The immediate causes of the Macondo well blowout can be traced to a series of identifiable mistakes made by BP, Halliburton, and Transocean that reveal such systematic failures in risk management that they place in doubt the safety culture of the entire industry. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:30 am by Mara Hatfield
The immediate causes of the Macondo well blowout can be traced to a series of identifiable mistakes made by BP, Halliburton, and Transocean that reveal such systematic failures in risk management that they place in doubt the safety culture of the entire industry. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 4:00 am by Bryan Fears
Specifically, errors by the responsible companies – BP, Halliburton, and Transocean – included inadequate safety procedures, failure to respond to repeatedly demonstrated problems, and ineffective response to the blowout once it began. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 6:23 pm by D. Todd Smith
KBR (Kellogg, Brown & Root)-Halliburton (No. 05-09-00395-CV). [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 6:23 pm by D. Todd Smith
KBR (Kellogg, Brown & Root)-Halliburton (No. 05-09-00395-CV). [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 1:12 pm by Maritime Law Staff
The Justice Department is likely to believe that BP, Transocean and Halliburton were negligent and should be criminally charged. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:39 am by Beth Graham
KBR (Kellogg, Brown & Root) – Halliburton, No. 05-09-00395-CV, (Tex. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:53 pm by Russell Cawyer
KBR (Kellogg, Brown & Root) --Halliburton, the Dallas court held that an arbitrator's failure to disclose, in an employment discrimination, breach of contract and retaliation case, that he had served as an arbitrator in a prior case involving KBR's party representative and a related company established facts that might create a reasonable impression of the arbitrator's partiality. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
  More About Halliburton: As I noted in yesterday’s blog post, the U.S. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Where plaintiffs have been able to show, using internal documents or confidential witness testimony, that there was a mismatch between what a company was telling investors and what its people were saying internally, the cases have been allowed to proceed. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
Halliburton (09-1403), raises the question of whether investors may pursue such a claim as a class action, if they cannot prove at the outset that any loss they suffered was traced directly to the company that misled the stock market about its securities. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:11 pm by brettb
  It spreads blame from BP and Halliburton to Transocean for the disaster that caused the deaths of 11 workers and hundreds of millions in property damage and damage to a region’s economic interests. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:36 pm by WIMS
Errors and misjudgments by at least three companies -- BP, Halliburton and Transocean -- contributed to the disaster. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 8:24 am by Coplan, Prof. Karl S.
Whether purposeful or not, many of the decisions that BP, Halliburton, and Transocean made that increased the risk of the Macondo blowout clearly saved those companies significant time (and money).* There is nothing inherently wrong with choosing a less-costly or less-time-consuming alternative—as long as it is proven to be equally safe. [read post]