Search for: "HAMMER v HAMMER"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2015, 1:11 am
Supreme Court, in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
De Cruz Lee v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:54 am
Sikora v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 1:42 pm
Take for example the recent Alberta decisions in Ledcor Construction Limited v Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Company. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
In Epps v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm
The use of a weapon, depending on the manner in which it is used, may also be indicative of the intent to inflict serious physical injury (People v Haynes, 39 AD3d 562 [2nd Dept 2007] [defendant killed the victim by driving a car straight at him]); People v Lewis, 300 AD2d 827 [3rd Dept 2002] [defendant killed victim by stabbing victim causing a deep penetrating wound through the back to the heart]; People v Owens, 251 AD2d 898 [3rd Dept 1998] [defendant shot victim… [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am
As Venkat indicates, the judges in both cases hammered on the fact that Lyft and Uber provide detailed performance instructions to their drivers and then penalize non-compliance. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:28 am
See, e.g., Park ’N Fly, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:01 am
A recent case, Pittman v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
In Flenke v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:43 am
LEXIS 25519 (D AZ, March 2, 2015), an Arizona federal district court dismissed with leave to amend an inmate's complaint that trash, contraband or notes were sometimes placed in kosher meals.In Hammer v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:13 am
And `almost instantaneously when [he] turned to run[,]’ Harmon heard a `click[,]’ which sounded like `the hammer coming down on a gun. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 1:45 pm
Relying heavily on Skilling v. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 12:06 pm
See http://constitution.org/reform/us/con_amend.htm However, as you will find in the introduction to the proposals, simply calling an Article V convention and expecting the delegates to come up with proposals, without a long process of hammering out proposed amendments by experts, on which the convention would just vote up or down without changes, would at best be a disaster. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 2:29 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 11:03 am
Circuit decision–the 2008 ruling in Belbacha v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 12:22 pm
To be fair, we find ourselves rooting for the Commission as it brings the hammer down on a revenge porn site. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:32 am
The case is PP v. [read post]
