Search for: "HOME PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL v. US " Results 541 - 560 of 1,676
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
’ (So Much More than Words,TWITTER.COM, https://about.twitter.com/products/photo-sharing (last visited March 12, 2015)). [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 5:53 pm by Shahid Buttar
Only two years ago, the Supreme Court held in Riley v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
That invitation constitutes the bulk of a recent press release of the International Court of Justice: (Press Release; Unofficial [No. 2024/1] 3 January 2024).Proceedings instituted by South Africa against Israel on 29 December 2023Request for the indication of provisional measuresPublic hearings to be held on Thursday 11 and Friday 12 January 2024THE HAGUE, 3 January 2024. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:59 am by Matrix Law
Herculito Maritime Ltd and others v Gunvor International BV and others, heard 14th June 2023. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:32 am by Cory Doctorow
Standards-washing: the lesson of Bush v Gore But not all interoperability is created equal. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
  And it leverages the use by the US authorities of its moral power to influence the conduct of  US based enterprises within the global economic sphere. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(The IP Factor) ‘Laboratoire Remede’ and ‘Remede Spa’ considered generic (The IP Factor) Supreme Court rules that usage of ‘Shemesh’ (Sun) by competing restaurant is kosher (The IP Factor) Israel patent office publishes decision on design for kerb-stone (IP Factor)   Italy Italy scores three more PDOs - Marrone di Caprese Michelangelo, Pomodorino del Piennolo del Vesuvio, Crudo di Cuneo (Class 46) Lavazza to Nespresso – we were in Heaven first (Class… [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 11:32 pm
’ (Romeo and Juliet, II, II) If a scent is not an intrinsic characteristic of the product and is not commonly used (e.g. floral fragrances in fabric softeners), it can be distinctive, since smell ‘is probably the most reliable memory that humans possess’ (Eden SARL v OHIM [2005] ECR II-4705 [25]). [read post]