Search for: "Hague v. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 1,200
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Also on Wednesday it will hear the appeal of Youssef v Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs involving whether the Foreign Secretary was entitled to allow Mr Youssef to be added to the United Nations’ list of people subject to asset freezing. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 3:32 pm by Zack Bluestone
” For its part, the United States expressed a more restrained sense of optimism, at least officially. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 6:48 am by Elina Saxena
In light of the United States’ recent freedom of navigation exercise in the South China Sea, Adam Klein and Mira Rapp-Hooper asked what the United States signaled by sailing within twelve nautical miles of China’s artificially constructed island. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 11:38 am by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
The United States will also lift sanctions against nine Belarussian entities, though it is unclear which. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 12:21 pm by Zack Bluestone
”   In other news… United States The Straits Times reports that the United States is stepping up aid for maritime law enforcement agencies in Southeast Asia. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 12:40 pm by Charles Kotuby
Guyot to the present day, demonstrates some of the problems indicated by recent cases, and comments on the federalism concerns that are delaying the ratification of the 2005 Hague Choice of Courts Convention in the United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Lisa Girdwood, Brodies LLP
The Hague Convention has the force of law within the United Kingdom by virtue of CACA 1985, s 1(2). [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 2:51 am
The United States now remains the only place where the patent is still valid. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by Dianne Saxe
Massachusetts v EPA, 549 US 497 (2007); Comer v Murphy Oil USA, 839 F Supp (2d) 849 (SD Miss 2012); Native Village of Kivalina v ExxonMobil Corp, 696 F 3d 849 (9th Cir 2012). [4] Friends of the Earth v Canada (Governor in Council), 2008 FC 1184, aff’d 2009 FCA 297, leave to appeal to the SCC denied, [2009] SCCA 497. [5] Turp v Canada, 2012 FC 893. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 10:08 am by Daniel Reisner
Forty-one of the 47 state members of the HRC nevertheless voted to accept it; the sole negative vote came from the United States, while the five abstentions came from India, Kenya, Ethiopia, Paraguay and Macedonia. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:00 pm by Charlie Dunlap
  In other words, it rejects the proposition reflected in the 1986 International Court of Justice case of Nicaragua v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:02 pm by Brian Toth
The treaty and its implementing legislation command courts to return children to their countries of habitual residence if the children were wrongfully removed from their country or wrongfully retained in the United States. [read post]
27 May 2015, 2:31 am
Design in Case T-22/13In Joined Cases T-22/13 and T-23/13 Senz Technologies v OHIM - Impliva (Parapluies) the General Court decided on an application to invalidate two of Senz's Community designs consisting of the appearance of umbrellas as represented on the right.Impliva challenged the registrations on absolute grounds, under Article 52 in combination with Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation 6/2002 on Community designs, on the ground that the contested designs produced the same overall… [read post]
20 May 2015, 6:58 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner is a United States citizen, and respondent became a legal resident of the United States after the parties were married. [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:45 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner would have incurred the costs of feeding, clothing and otherwise supporting his children and himself whether his children were in the United States or Germany. [read post]