Search for: "Harmon v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2010, 1:38 pm
Commercial law The regulation of private equity, hedge funds and state funds Harmonization of finance leases by UNIDROIT Corporate governance Insurance contract law between business law and consumer protection III. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 am
More fundamentally, the United States Supreme Court struck down a statute enacted by the State of Washington which granted “breathtakingly broad” grandparent visitation, Troxel v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:56 pm
Pusateri v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:57 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Mission Bay Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 11:26 am
§1831d(a), which allows an FDIC-insured state bank to export to out-of-state borrowers the interest rate permitted by the state in which the state bank is located to its most favored lender, regardless of any contrary laws of such borrowers’ states. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
" (citation omitted)];Matter of Kittredge v Planning Bd. of Town of Liberty, 57 AD3d 1336, 1339 [2008] ["In construing a statute, a court must attempt to harmonize all its provisions and to give meaning to all its parts, considered as a whole, in accord with legislative intent. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 6:54 am
" (Bonz Group (Pty) Ltd v Cooke [1994] 3 N.Z.L.R. 216). [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 1:30 pm
In Hamilton v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm
Case style: Neese v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:59 pm
” In the case of Jones v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm
There was never any claim that the legislature’s enactment conflicted with, or needed to be harmonized with, the state constitution. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
One major concern we have raised within this debate is that, when seeking to harmonize safeguards, there is a race to the bottom of human rights protections. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm
One major concern we have raised within this debate is that, when seeking to harmonize safeguards, there is a race to the bottom of human rights protections. [read post]
Mayo Foundation v. U.S.: Supreme Court Brushes Off Medical Residents, Unsettles Agency Deference Law
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:00 am
Accordingly, [the OHIM was right] in finding [here] that the national law applicable under Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 would be considered in the same manner as a factual issue and that it was not in a position to automatically determine, with precision, the law of all of the Member States concerning the rights within the scope of Article 8(4) [Do: ask the EU to harmonize the national laws which protect signs used in the course of trade; Don't: expect OHIM to… [read post]
24 May 2018, 1:13 pm
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 6:57 am
EU-Member state issues: need to ask new questions—is a regulation v a directive conclusive? [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am
" the Court note[d] that, with regard to the nature and extent of the protection which Member States may recognize broadcasting organizations, the Directive does not harmonize any differences between national laws, so it does not preclude more protective provisions. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
Marlon Dean Harmon v. [read post]
