Search for: "He v. Holder" Results 541 - 560 of 5,722
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
However, I recently re-visited a 1929 case with an intriguing family connection:  Dedman v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:43 am
Under Article 11 CDR, the protection kicks off on “the date on which the design was first made available to the public within the Community”, and that very event is all Articles 85 and 11 CDR require the right holder to prove when they make reference to “Section 1”.The absence of registration formalities, the Court continued, also makes it necessary for the holder of the unregistered design to specify what he or she wishes to have protected. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:57 am by Adam Levitin
There's been a lot of media coverage of the recent ruling of the NY Supreme Court (that's the trial court, not the final Court of Appeals) in MBIA v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:26 am by Anupam Chander
The burden, Judge Stanton argues, falls on the copyright holder and not YouTube. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am by Douglas McGregor, Brodies LLP
Lord Drummond Young considered that despite differences in the legislation involved, there were “underlying substantive similarities” with Monk v Warbey which supported the view he took of the Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 2:22 pm
Gilman asserted that in doing so, `neither [he] nor any other privilege holder waives any applicable privilege(s). [read post]