Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 82,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 10:35 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in the case of Harrington v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:37 am
Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974), this Court held that a waiver of state sovereign immunity must be “stated ‘by the most express language or by such overwhelming implication from the text as will leave no room for any other reasonable construction. [read post]
26 Jun 2006, 12:00 pm
In Kansas v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:58 pm
Harper, which held that… Continue reading The post “The Supreme Court Summons the Ghosts of Bush v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:36 am
This is the first published California decision addressing the issue since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
The United States Supreme Court held in Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 4:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:23 am
Last Friday for the first time I used the new United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 2:01 pm
Attorney General, United States, 69 F.4th 96 (3d Cir. 2023) (en banc), which held that 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:44 pm
And there is no precedent for a state legislature to appoint electors after a state's presidential election was held. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:36 am
In Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:24 pm
United States, No. 11-820 (Feb. 20, 2013).We've blogged about what I still believe to be the landmark decision of Padilla v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 9:26 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 4:10 am
SPITZER v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:10 am
In United States Mission Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
State Univ., 87 Ohio St.3d 55 (1999), the court held that “the federal and Ohio Equal Protection Clauses are to be construed and analyzed identically. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:29 am
The judgment in NS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] QB 102 did refer to a systemic breach but the CJEU’s focus was on Member States’ awareness of such a breach, rather than the type of breach. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
Accordingly, Circuit Court concluded that the audit was within the scope of the Fund trustees’ authority under the Supreme Court’s decision inCentral States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
Accordingly, Circuit Court concluded that the audit was within the scope of the Fund trustees’ authority under the Supreme Court’s decision inCentral States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. [read post]
United States v. Fosler: CAAF holds Article 134 adultery sample specification fails to state offense
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
Is Parker v. [read post]
