Search for: "Herring v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 58,121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court heard argument in Nelson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
As the first Hispanic woman and first person from El Paso to ascend to the presidency, Sylvia discusses her unique campaign path, the importance of these “firsts” and the progress they represent, and then also zeros in on two specific issues: her hopes to tackle the problem of “legal deserts” in the state, and her thoughts on McDonald et al v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:08 pm
As chief justice of the United States, Chase is chiefly remembered for his nationalistic opinion in Texas v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 6:12 am
Last week, I commented on United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Cave v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
State v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:49 am
Eliezer Lazo, Case No. 11-20447-Cr-Altonaga; United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:49 am
Eliezer Lazo, Case No. 11-20447-Cr-Altonaga; United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 4:35 am
State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 3:57 pm
An audio recording of this morning's oral argument in Rubio v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 10:33 pm
Smart folks are still trying to work out whether the Herring case decided last week by the US Supreme Court narrowing the exclusionary rule is a big deal or a little one, and several good blog posts by attorneys have helped me think about the issue more concretely.Kent Scheidegger even thinks "Herring may be setting the stage for the Holy Grail -- overruling Mapp v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 11:30 am
–Garnier v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 9:07 am
Xia v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:49 pm
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Diaz v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
State v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:59 am
STATE OF MONTANA, by and through LINDA McCULLOUCH, in her capacity as Secretary of State, Defendant and Appellant. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
Tuesday’s oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:55 pm
In its second opinion of the term, CAAF today reversed the Army CCA in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:52 am
The post Case Comment: R (Reilly & Anor) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
