Search for: "Holder v. United States of America"
Results 541 - 560
of 619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm
Graham subsequently asked Kagan whether she agreed, and she responded that Graham and Holder had accurately stated the law. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
I quote:“[A]ny civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am
If ever there were justification for intrusive judicial review of constitutional provisions that protect “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:36 am
This excerpt from their “about” page will give you the flavour: The United States remains a nation at war. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 7:02 am
In Apache v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re Carmine's… [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 12:59 pm
Solicitor General Elena Kagan will then argue for the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 6:17 am
That leaves the one factual claim in Obama's brief reference to the decision: the age of the law the court voided in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:02 pm
We got it because someone in Nigeria respected, trusted, and cared enough for the safety of the United States to walk into our Embassy and alert officials there to what his son might do. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
Hyundai Motor America (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Cal App 4th guidance on pre-discovery trade secret disclosures: Perlan Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am
" Any holdups in the case were the results of FireStar's inability to pay and reluctance to make key decisions, like authorizing the hiring of experts, the firm stated in court documents. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
The evil that Emperor Norton abolished, of course, was the Congress of the United States of America. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Magistrates in the Tang Dynasty in early China were also eager to avoid the formal legal system and so encouraged parties to resolve disputes amicably between themselves.[9] In contrast, the United States’ patent law can be seen in the case of Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Docket: 08-1569 Title: United States v. [read post]
