Search for: "Holmes v State" Results 541 - 560 of 1,534
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2014, 10:23 am by Lyle Denniston
  After the Supreme Court’s decision last year in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Planning Board so that an Environmental Impact Statement may be prepared (see Matter of West Branch Conservation Assn. v Planning Bd. of Town of Clarkstown, 207 AD2d 837, 841; Matter of Holmes v Brookhaven Town Planning Bd., 137 AD2d 601, 604). [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Planning Board so that an Environmental Impact Statement may be prepared (see Matter of West Branch Conservation Assn. v Planning Bd. of Town of Clarkstown, 207 AD2d 837, 841; Matter of Holmes v Brookhaven Town Planning Bd., 137 AD2d 601, 604). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
  In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German… [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
Their colleague stated that the two were having an affair and that it was “common knowledge”. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 7:21 am by Gerard Magliocca
The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Holmes, held that Limitation of Liability Act applied to tort claims brought in the United States against the vessel's owner. 2. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:07 pm
Massachusetts, in which Justice Holmes held that the state's compelling interest in protecting the public health outweighed an individual's Fourteenth Amendment-based liberty interest. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:02 pm by Dan Flynn
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in National Pork Producers Council v Karen Ross on Oct. 11. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:27 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Perry intercalates abundant (and delightful) quotations from 18th century cases with his own discussion as he makes valuable points concerning the current debate on copyright rationale and scope.Part V “The lore of courts”Shubha Ghosh, in Chapter 10, “‘If Music Did Not Pay’: The State Court Roots of Justice Holmes’ Intellectual Property Jurisprudence”, considers IP decisions by Justice Holmes, when he was still serving on… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  At the state level, in Virginia, the same 1924 legislative session originated both the eugenical sterizilization act at issue in Buck v. [read post]