Search for: "Holmes v. Powers"
Results 541 - 560
of 660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
[This is a long read, but very important for FOIA litigators!] [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm
The case of Sorrell v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:41 am
(What I vehemently reject is Justice Holmes’s solo dissent in Lochner, which was praised on Friday by Chief Justice Roberts, that effectively makes the presumption irrebuttable.) [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 6:10 am
The Court’s precedent indicates that those include the power to pardon, the power to remove executive officers he has appointed, and the power to recognize foreign countries. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
But there is no ongoing control over the person holding that power. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
Yet, no one involved appears to have questioned the federal courts’ power to order the whole arrangement unraveled. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
Yet, no one involved appears to have questioned the federal courts’ power to order the whole arrangement unraveled. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
Yet, no one involved appears to have questioned the federal courts’ power to order the whole arrangement unraveled. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
No, but Congress does have the power to decide not to tax any sub-category of income, if it so desires. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
No, but Congress does have the power to decide not to tax any sub-category of income, if it so desires. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 12:56 pm
Like Holmes in INS v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Schaefer v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:40 am
(2015) Michael Paulsen & Luke Paulsen, The Constitution: An Introduction (2015) Thomas Leonard, Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era (2016) Tara Smith, Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System (2015) Ilya Somin, The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 12:35 pm
Texas v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 3:39 am
However, a Member of the House of Lords, Lord Holmes of Richmond, has proposed a Private Members’ Bill. [read post]
