Search for: "House v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 25,025
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2019, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
LPD New York, LLC v. adidas America, Inc., 2018 WL 6437078 (EDNY Dec. 7, 2018). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
LPD New York, LLC v. adidas America, Inc., 2018 WL 6437078 (EDNY Dec. 7, 2018). [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 1:04 pm
Van Colle (administrator of the estate of GC (deceased)) and another (Original-Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) Smith (Respondent) v Chief Constable of Sussex Police (Appellant) [2008] UKHL 50 (30 July 2008) Caldarelli (Appellant) v Court of Naples (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 51 (30 July 2008) R (on the application of M) (FC)… [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 1:49 am
Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Respondent) and one other action [2007] UKHL 28 Wilson (Respondent) v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:05 pm
The Case The Supreme Court of the United States recently overturned the Defense of Marriage Act when it found the act to be unconstitutional in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am by ISAAC RICHARDSON
Foskett J was clearly sympathetic to the suggestion of the Secretary of State that the UK would be in compliance with the Convention if they continued to house the families in the SBAs, but transferred the responsibility for securing their other rights to another signatory state. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 6:52 am by Christine Corcos
This article provides a historical argument that the nondelegation doctrine did not enjoy pre-eminence during the Founding, as some originalists, including the respondents in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 6:52 am
This article provides a historical argument that the nondelegation doctrine did not enjoy pre-eminence during the Founding, as some originalists, including the respondents in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]