Search for: "Hughes v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,956
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2007, 11:37 am
Hughes and Stephen Hughes v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 8:34 am
The US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
The only “media case” amongh the five was Novaya Gazeta V Voronezhe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Zillow Group, Inc., October 17, 2022, Hughes, T.). [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12] Wood v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 7:00 am
” Hughes Bros. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 8:36 am
The issue of formulas came on again in Galski v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:53 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:43 am
Analysis of the Crawford Decision On January 26, 2009, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Crawford v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 8:31 am
In Armstrong Pump, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 5:08 pm
” (Shaaban Bin Hussien v Chong Fook Kam [1970] AC 942, at 948). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
California together with United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
The case is styled, Vinings Insurance Company v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 10:30 am
Lyons v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:59 am
United States Bureau of Prisons, 2013 U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 6:16 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:54 am
In two decisions from the Second Department last Tuesday (Hughes v Webb, 2007 NY Slip Op 04597 and Langhorne v County of Nassau, 2007 NY Slip Op 04602), the Court held that evidence of the "permanence" of particular injuries fall outside of the rule. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
In these cases, which certainly include D and V, a proper criminal investigation by the state is required. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 8:47 am
The court noted that the issue was a novel one - whether there are limits to the increases a state can make to the severity of punishments for possessing weapons - but chose not to address it beyond saying that without strict scrutiny, the defendant could not prevail, and this was an intermediate scrutiny issue.People v Hughes is important because the Court of Appeals upheld the Appellate Division decision that defendant's purported CPL 330 motion was sufficient to… [read post]