Search for: "Hurt v. United States" Results 541 - 560 of 1,718
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2011, 12:13 pm by Brian Cuban
It is also the opinion of The Supreme Court Of The United States(SCOTUS). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:24 pm by My name
The suit was filed in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, a court that has previously ruled in favor of the league on similar disputes (in NBA v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
While the Supreme Court has not retreated from the core holding in Ferber, it has made shutting down the marketplace more difficult with its child pornography holdings in a series of cases, including United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
United of Omaha Life Insurance Co., 430 F. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 4:39 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
It doesn’t matter that, when Pollard is hurt at a prison the United States of America sent him to, he can’t sue the United States or its officers, and can’t use the United States’ laws for redress. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 3:56 pm by My name
Earlier this month a United Kingdom court took their turn on stage in the world-wide Apple v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:33 am by SHG
Otherwise, chances are pretty good that they will believe that you ruined their chances of "justice" by failing to raise that winner point, the one you left on the table.But try to cover them all and you can anticipate some snarky judge to write what Third Circuit Judge Aldisert did in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:34 pm by Justin Walsh
  Of course, none of that would have been necessary had not exactly two years prior, on this day in 2006, the Washington State Supreme Court handed down a shockingly backwards decision in Andersen v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Jani
As was stated by Lord Justice Gibson in Asprey & Garrard Ltd v WRA (Guns) Ltd: "...the defence has never been held to apply to names of new companies as otherwise a route to piracy would be obvious". [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:39 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
IRS Abuses Power in Targeting Tea Party The extraordinary revelation this week that the Internal Revenue Service targeted tea party groups for more aggressive enforcement highlights exactly why caution is needed in any response to the much-vilified Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The Missouri Compromise of 1820, engineered largely by Henry Clay, temporarily settled the issue of where slavery would be permitted in the United States, establishing the Mason-Dixon Line as the boundary between free and slave states. [read post]