Search for: "ILLINOIS v. MICHIGAN" Results 541 - 560 of 951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are:  Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 5:16 am by Eugene Volokh
DeCiccio (which held that the Second Amendment protects dirks and police batons), as well as between this decision and the Michigan Court of Appeals’ decision in State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1:1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:21 am by Andrew Frisch
Illinois & Michigan, 451 U.S. 304, 329 n. 22, 101 S.Ct. 1784, 68 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981), and it did not do so with respect to unauthorized aliens. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Bayer Corp., 398 F.3d 640, 643 (7th Cir. 2005) (applying Illinois law); Thomas v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 opinion by Judge Neil Gorsuch in Epic Systems v. [read post]
The District Court’s order stated only that Plaintiffs’ “state law subclasses are for Pennsylvania, Connecticut, New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Illinois, Michigan, New Hampshire, North Carolina, and Ohio,” without defining the scope of those subclasses. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:58 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Murphy v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:01 am by Anthony Sanders
This includes New Jersey (1947 constitution), Michigan (1963), Illinois (1970), and Montana (1972). [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 1:00 pm by Orin S. Kerr
  It starts with the law of probable cause, with the main cases being Illinois v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 2:30 am
A majority of states including Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Illinois and New Jersey have judicially recognized the right to privacy in case law. [read post]