Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: K. F." Results 541 - 560 of 2,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
Byline Times had a piece “’F*ck Boris’ Are Schoolchildren Now Under Political Surveillance? [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
            CPLR 3215 (b), as amended provides that a party entitled to judgment may be permitted to submit, in addition to the proof required by CPLR 3215 (f), properly executed affidavits or affirmations as proof of damages. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
K Street has always been a favored perch for ex-lawmakers, but the recent moves from conservatives are attracting controversy. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Thirty-four states have major tax changes taking effect on January 1, 2020. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
Some Boards indicate that there is such a prohibition but that legitimate interest arises from e.g. broad vs narrow or from a longer term in case of internal priority (and one could also consider new states acceding to the EPC or becoming a new validation state in the priority period). [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Department of Health and Social Care has released its contract with Amazon and according to the group, the content of the contract is to a large extent redacted and that it would contest the department’s decision for the public interest. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 12:59 pm by Stuart Kaplow
In the interest of disclosure, I am a gubernatorial appointee to the Maryland Green Building Council. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:11 am
One of my personal claims to fame is that a prominent copyright stakeholder said, “what the f@@k was that? [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 1:32 pm by Rob Robinson
You may read and copy any reports or other information filed by OpenText or Carbonite at the SEC public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Congress has made no conflict-of-interest rules limiting the interactions of lobbyists returning to Capitol Hill. [read post]