Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 541 - 560
of 882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 11:17 pm
Here, the Judge considered the same type of publication, by means of Google Inc’s Blogger platform, which was very recently at issue in Davison (see my earlier Inforrm case comment here). [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:52 pm
In our contribution to the continuing debate on this issue we are re-posting this two-part discussion on the history and future of privacy law from Inforrm’s Blog. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:09 pm
In this article, specially written for INFORRM, Press Gang editor Paddy French explains why the book is designed to be an important contribution to the phone hacking saga. *************** FOR MORE than three decades I’ve been an investigative reporter specialising in corruption, at local political and national levels. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 5:33 pm
Hugh Tomlinson QC is a member of the Matrix Chambers media and information practice group and editor of Inforrm. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 2:42 am
The list is extracted from our “Table of Cases 2010-2011 ” and includes links to the judgments (where available) and, where applicable, the Inforrm blog posts and comments on them as well the useful case notes and comments provided on the websites of barristers’ chambers 1 Brick Court (“1BC”) and 5 Raymond Buildings (“5RB”). [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:17 pm
Privacy and data protection In an Inforrm blog post towards the end of 2011, Kirsten Sjovoll drew attention to the piecemeal nature of privacy law in the United states and this quality is emphasised by the range of cases due to be decided in the year ahead. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 5:48 pm
. ● Anya Proops QC in an Inforrm’s Blog, “A war of words: EU sanctions and the blocking of online ‘disinformation,’” asks whether recent EU sanctions prohibiting the broadcasting of Russian state news organizations in Europe may undermine the liberal democratic values they are intended to protect? [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:25 am
Writing on Inforrm’s blog, Tim Lowles gives an excellent summary of the privacy developments within the “May Madness” month. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 6:38 am
. ● Inforrm’s Blog published an overview of the proposed UK Online Harms Bill which will establish a new statutory duty of care intended to make online companies take responsibility for the safety of their users. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:31 pm
It does, however, remove the current requirement for the opinion to be on a matter of public interest (for a comment on this see the recent Inforrm post by Gavin Phillipson). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 pm
The recent decision in Adelson v Anderson [2011] EWHC 2497 (QB) (Inforrm comment here) showed that such an application can be effective where the reputational interests at stake are modified by the time taken to pursue the claim. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 5:06 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Crookes v Newton 2011 SCC 47, written up here for Inforrm by Paul Schabas and Jon Goheen, has been hailed as a victory for free speech online. [read post]
5 May 2011, 5:25 pm
As Inforrm has previously reported, Mullis and Scott propose that the overwhelming majority of English libel cases should be considered by the County Court, the Tribunals Service, or an appropriate media regulatory body. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:21 pm
Writing for Inforrm’s Blog Stephanie Alice Baker, Matthew Wade, Michael James Walsh argue that tech companies’ strategies to address the COVID-19 “infodemic” have resulted in overly broad and inconsistent interpretations of “harm” to justify restrictions which are undermining effectiveness, transparency as well as the public trust. ● In case you missed it, the National Law University Delhi hosted a discussion Celebrating Three… [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 5:54 am
The need for strict compliance with these requirements has been repeatedly emphasised in the case law (see the 2012 Inforrm post, Practice: Without notice injunction procedure – a further warning for practitioners). [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 1:54 am
As previously reported on The Injunctions Blog and on Inforrm the High Court held that it had jurisdiction to grant website-blocking injunctions against ISPs in cases involving trade mark infringement. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:25 am
This post first appeared on Inforrm’s Blog and is reproduced here with permission and thanks. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 4:49 pm
Stirling also highlighted the issue of the representation of black as opposed to white footballers by British media outlets, a matter later picked up by the Guardian and Brian Cathcart on the INFORRM Blog. [read post]
