Search for: "Imperial v. State"
Results 541 - 560
of 636
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
For that, they relied on the Justices’ one-line ruling on Oct. 10, 1971, in Baker v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 9:22 pm
Adler) There are quite a few interesting posts on the standing issues in Perry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 12:23 pm
Diamond v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
See Walker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:07 am
May, decided in 1987, and Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:37 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 1:52 pm
Judge Walker has ordered that the stay of entry of judgment in Perry v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 12:35 pm
The judge relied quite heavily upon a 1997 decision by the Supreme Court — Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Department of Justice News Release, July 22, 2010 Champion Chemical Company, Imperial Oil Company Inc. and Imperial’s two former officers have agreed to pay at least $1.4 million to resolve actions to enforce a prior agreement to reimburse cleanup costs incurred by the federal government at the Imperial Oil Company Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 9:17 pm
In one case, Goddard v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
TATE v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:23 pm
Madison, Martin v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 8:09 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:39 am
The first case, which bore Senator Byrd's name — Raines v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:35 pm
491/01 British American Tobacco (Investments) and Imperial Tobacco [2002] ECR I-11453, paragraph 60, and Case C-217/04 United Kingdom v Parliament and Council [2006] ECR I? [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:38 am
Supreme Court: Abbott v. [read post]