Search for: "In Re: B.R.-2"
Results 541 - 560
of 568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2006, 11:12 am
In re Petit-Louis, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 1793642 (Bankr. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 4:52 pm
In re Beasley, 339 B.R. 472 (Bankr. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 4:52 pm
In re Beasley, 339 B.R. 472 (Bankr. [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
post, where we mentioned the Hubbard, 333 B.R. 377, Valdez, 335 B.R. 801, and Rios, 336 B.R. 177 cases, all of which have effectively held that a filing by a debtor who has not completed the counseling requirements should be stricken, such that it will not count as a prior case in the event of a subsequent filing (the Valdez case actually "dismisses" rather than "strikes", but nonetheless makes clear that it will not be considered as a "case in… [read post]
18 Apr 2006, 3:50 pm
post, where we mentioned the Hubbard, 333 B.R. 377, Valdez, 335 B.R. 801, and Rios, 336 B.R. 177 cases, all of which have effectively held that a filing by a debtor who has not completed the counseling requirements should be stricken, such that it will not count as a prior case in the event of a subsequent filing (the Valdez case actually "dismisses" rather than "strikes", but nonetheless makes clear that it will not be considered as a "case in… [read post]
10 Apr 2006, 2:01 pm
Jay Cristol, In re Petit-Louis, 338 B.R. 132 (Bankr.S.D.Fla. 3/1/06), however, holds that the requirement cannot be imposed on a debtor who has very limited English-speaking ability, where no approved counseling agency had counselors who spoke the debtor's language.In Petit-Louis, Judge Cristol waived the pre-petition credit counseling requirement because, notwithstanding considerable effort, the Creole-speaking Mr. [read post]
10 Apr 2006, 2:01 pm
Jay Cristol, In re Petit-Louis, 338 B.R. 132 (Bankr.S.D.Fla. 3/1/06), however, holds that the requirement cannot be imposed on a debtor who has very limited English-speaking ability, where no approved counseling agency had counselors who spoke the debtor's language.In Petit-Louis, Judge Cristol waived the pre-petition credit counseling requirement because, notwithstanding considerable effort, the Creole-speaking Mr. [read post]
6 Apr 2006, 8:10 am
In one of the first published decisions on the complicated new provisions, In re Hardacre, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 541028 (Bankr. [read post]
6 Apr 2006, 8:10 am
In one of the first published decisions on the complicated new provisions, In re Hardacre, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 541028 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 6:16 am
In re Johnson, 2006 WL 270231; In re Robinson, 2006 WL 349801; In re Wright, 2006 WL 547824.None of those cases answer the question that is posed in In re Ezell, 338 B.R. 330 (Bankr. [read post]
4 Apr 2006, 6:16 am
In re Johnson, 2006 WL 270231; In re Robinson, 2006 WL 349801; In re Wright, 2006 WL 547824.None of those cases answer the question that is posed in In re Ezell, 338 B.R. 330 (Bankr. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am
Ala. 2/28/06), the court confirmed, like in In re Robinson, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 349801, that the BAPCPA amendments do not abrogate Till v. [read post]
3 Apr 2006, 8:31 am
Ala. 2/28/06), the court confirmed, like in In re Robinson, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 349801, that the BAPCPA amendments do not abrogate Till v. [read post]
6 Mar 2006, 11:10 am
In re Kaplan, 331 B.R. 483 (Bankr. [read post]
6 Mar 2006, 11:10 am
In re Kaplan, 331 B.R. 483 (Bankr. [read post]
1 Mar 2006, 2:33 pm
The court did note, however, that under 11 U.S.C. 1322(b)(2), the debtor may still modify the term and interest rate of the loan.This latter point was discussed in greater detail in In re Robinson, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 349801 (Bankr. [read post]
1 Mar 2006, 2:33 pm
The court did note, however, that under 11 U.S.C. 1322(b)(2), the debtor may still modify the term and interest rate of the loan.This latter point was discussed in greater detail in In re Robinson, __ B.R. __, 2006 WL 349801 (Bankr. [read post]
22 Feb 2006, 9:27 am
See In re Childs, 335 B.R. 623 (Bankr. [read post]
22 Feb 2006, 9:27 am
See In re Childs, 335 B.R. 623 (Bankr. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 10:01 pm
In re Steingbrecher, 110 B.R. 155 (Bankr. [read post]
