Search for: "In Re Brand"
Results 541 - 560
of 14,134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2012, 6:30 am
Wyeth Inc. and In re Lamictal Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litigation did not involve a monetary transfer from the brand patent holder to the generic drug maker. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:46 am
Second, I’m not sure that the second “Houston” re-brand is a significant improvement from the original “South Texas College of Law. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
Suppose you’re a brand manager or trademark counsel for one of the previous COOL brands, would you chill or start to melt down, and why? [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:18 pm
We’ve grown up and now we’re working hard to make a difference in the world, whether by stemming the effects of climate change or by increasing the reach of social justice initiatives. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:25 am
The Chapter 7 case is In re Raving Brands, Inc., Ch. 7 Case No. 09-68410 (Order for Relief, August 20, 2010) and the adversary proceeding is Anderson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:52 pm
Afro Leo has always felt that such a view underestimates the value of a brand not only in lowering market entry but in establishing market entrance altogether.The fact that almost the entire ruling centered around issues with branding, black out periods, licensing, split ownership and re-branding is therefore recognition that trade mark issues are important and relevant to merger approvals. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 3:58 am
In What Does a Re-Opened China (Without Quarantine) Mean for Foreign Business? [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 10:08 pm
Today, we’re not talking about that Purple Rain, that Color Purple, or those Purple People Eaters, and we’re especially not talking today about Purple Gloves, Purple Bags, Purple Jackets, Purple Candy Wrappers, or Purple Tags, no today, we’re talking about “The Purple Pill,” a/k/a Today’s Purple Pill — AstraZeneca’s blockbuster Nexium brand acid reflux medication. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:25 am
appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:25 am
appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:11 pm
It's going to be grand -- a brand new... wait for it...... fence! [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
You'd think people would also want to avoid extra sugar when they're drinking alcohol, but perhaps they're on a vacation from health concerns when they're drinking. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
There’s a wonderful little history in Modern Gentlemen Magazine (yes, there is such a publication) if you’re interested. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:55 am
However, we’re pleased to report that the list now features twice as many Canadian brands as last year. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 1:41 pm
Lawyers harnessing the power of social media to build their personal brands often butt heads with law firm leaders and marketing professionals looking to grow the firm’s brand. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:16 am
If you’re defensive you’ll never get real criticism. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:00 am
We’re all a little self-centered like that. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
What is the conventional wisdom in relaunching or revitalizing a brand: do you tell consumers that you're doing it, or not? [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:58 am
(You’re already small, you don’t have to pretend that you are!) [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 8:46 pm
” Each brand has a separate entrance and room configurations differ but the two brands share many services, which reduces costs and offers guests more amenities. [read post]
