Search for: "In Re Clothes, Inc." Results 541 - 560 of 753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2010, 6:48 pm by AdamSmith1776
" On the "What We've Lost" front, count: Computers: According to Della Femina, they're wonderful but they're cold, and what comes out of them is cold. [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:35 am by Jon Hyman
And, if you’re not in Cleveland, please support these guys by checking them out when they come through your town, this spring, summer, or beyond. [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:35 am by Jon Hyman
And, if you’re not in Cleveland, please support these guys by checking them out when they come through your town, this spring, summer, or beyond. [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:35 am by Jon Hyman
And, if you’re not in Cleveland, please support these guys by checking them out when they come through your town, this spring, summer, or beyond. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 1:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Wichita Water Conditioning, Inc., No. 18-cv-01656-MSK-SKC, 2020 WL 616359 (D. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(Plameco) (EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Cease and desist declaration only binding to the parties, not a natural or legal person signing on behalf of one of the parties: Metaco Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog)   Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess,… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46)   South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP)   Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns… [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 1:28 pm by Brett Frischmann
You have an outfit that moves with you, makes you look good, and you probably feel great each time you see how well your clothing fits and moves with you. [read post]
1 May 2015, 8:58 am by WIMS
<> The Toxic Truth About A New Generation of Nonstick and Waterproof Chemicals - Ten years ago, DuPont was forced to phase out a key chemical in making Teflon, after revelations that for nearly 45 years the company covered up evidence of its health hazards, including cancer and birth defects -- a new EWG investigation finds that the chemicals pushed by DuPont and other companies to replace the Teflon chemical and similar… [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such combination: Metso Minerals, Inc. v. [read post]