Search for: "In Re Digital Millennium Copyright Act" Results 541 - 560 of 630
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2010, 12:29 pm by David Kravets
Righthaven, he says, should have sent him a takedown notice under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, because the article was posted by a user, not the site itself. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:34 am by David Post
Here’s what I said then: The case was/is enormously important — Youtube was asserting that it was immune under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (specifically, Sec. 512(c)) from copyright infringement claims arising out of user postings. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:51 am by William Carleton
One way of appreciating the strength of the "safe harbor" protections afforded to social media and other sites by the DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) is the following paragraph from Judge Louis Stanton's order granting summary judgment to Google and YouTube, in the copyright infringement suit brought by Viacom and the Premier League:"From plaintiffs' submissions on the motions, a jury could find that the defendants not… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 7:29 pm by Ben Sheffner
Fung at 43 ("inducement liability and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act safe harbors are inherently contradictory. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 3:16 pm by Andrew Raff
: "The issue in the case focuses on the scope of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s safe harbor for online service providers set forth in section 512 of the copyright statute. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:29 am
Judge Stanton held that general knowledge of copyright infringement, no matter how widespread and blatant, was not enough for YouTube not to benefit from the Safe Harbour provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:56 pm
Instead, the court has granted Google's motion for summary judgment and asserted that YouTube fully qualifies for "safe harbor" protections under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. [read post]
19 May 2010, 1:53 pm by aallwash
The Copyright Committee prepared AALL’s comments for the triennial rule-making for new exemptions to Sec. 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and monitored the development of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 9:48 am by Jim Harper
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act established a system where copyright holders could as a practical matter force content off the Internet simply by requesting it. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This session tackles these questions in industry contexts such as Orange Book listings, standard-setting disclosures and Digital Millennium Copyright Act notices. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm by David Kravets
Fung’s position is that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act requires Hollywood to provide links to files to be removed. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm by David Post
It happened during the run-up to the 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act, and it will, I promise you, happen again here. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:48 pm by Larry Downes
(See Section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, http://www.copyright.gov/legislation/dmca.pdf) Viacom claims YouTube is not entitled to immunity in that it had actual knowledge of the infringing activities of its users. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 11:25 am by Eric
The E-commerce Directive was inspired by the Digital Millennium Copyright Act online safe harbors (17 USC 512), so it was oriented towards online copyright issues. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 8:08 am by Ashby Jones
A quick breakdown of the arguments: Viacom, the owner of Paramount Pictures, MTV and Comedy Central, cites internal YouTube memos and emails to argue that YouTube actively encouraged the distribution of infringing content, thereby disqualifying it from immunity under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:23 pm
 In the U.S., the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is the controlling law, and the safe harbor provisions are implemented by take-down and notice provisions. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:02 am by justinsilverman
Once informed of Candidate Walsh’s video, Rocker Walsh issued takedown demands to YouTube made possible through provisions in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]