Search for: "In Re Doe's Adoption" Results 541 - 560 of 13,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2024, 4:43 am by SHG
Abolish the Statutes of Limitation for Serious Felonies, and for Other Felonies Restart the Limitation Clock after Any New Felony Adopt a Fair Import Test in Place of a Strict Construction Test, after Adopting a Modern Criminal Code Format Adopt a Desert-based Distributive Principle, as per the Model Penal Code Establish a National Experts Group to Set Best Investigative Practices and to Help Gain Funding to Meet Them Enlarge Investigative Databases and Capabilities but… [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 1:09 pm by Linda A. Kerns
  When the biological parent does not consent to termination of his or her rights, step-parent adoptions become complex. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 4:07 am by SHG
We’re going to miss them when they’re gone, but by then, it’s too late. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 2:22 pm by pgbarnes
Does anyone know of a so-called independent review by a law firm that found the employer was completely un-justified in its actions (and thus potentially liable for serious monetary damages). [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:42 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The current SEC Chair, Jay Clayton, has said that he does not consider the issue to be a top priority, seemingly shelving the idea for the time being. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:55 pm by Jeff Foust
Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), “I think likes what we’re doing,” Rockefeller said near the end of the markup. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 11:03 am by Karen Breda
  Come and find out in Adventure and the Law.Wear your helmet; keep your hands and feet inside the vehicle at all times; and remember the motto Kuhne adopted while working the rapids:  "If you're not scared, you're not having fun. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 5:58 am by Staci Zaretsky
We're sure we could name a few. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:25 am
In re Franciscan Vineyards, Inc., Appeal No. 2014-1269 (Fed. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 8:48 am by ADaigle
However, deleting accounts does not, necessarily, get rid of the posts. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:14 am
Pologeorgis).As the Board stated in In re Sadoru Group, Ltd., 105 USPQ2d 1484, 1486 (TTAB 2012):A display of descriptive or otherwise unregistrable matter is not registrable on the Principal Register unless the design features of the asserted mark create an impression on the purchasers separate and apart from the impression made by the words themselves, or if it can be shown by evidence that the particular display which the applicant has adopted has acquired distinctiveness.As to… [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:16 pm
 In California, yes, you have a right to be told why you're being arrested. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:04 am by Beckman Steen & Lungstrom, P.A.
If you want to make sure this is addressed when you’re drafting divorce arrangements, make sure to let us know. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 7:52 am by Mark Tushnet
Rather, what's interesting to me is thinking about what one does in media res, that is, when one believes that one's opponents are actively engaging in norm breaches (perhaps with the aim of constructing a new set of norms). [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 7:52 am by Mark Tushnet
Rather, what's interesting to me is thinking about what one does in media res, that is, when one believes that one's opponents are actively engaging in norm breaches (perhaps with the aim of constructing a new set of norms). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:42 am by Harry Cole
 So while the O/FNPRM does not itself automatically adopt the new standard, the new Successor RP standard will be adopted without question. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 1:08 pm
On July 14, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in In re Lee, No. 137653. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by Richard Re
Richard Re (Virginia) is based on his draft article, "Does the Discourse on 303 Creative Portend a Standing Realignment," which is forthcoming in the Notre Dame Law Review Reflection. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:02 pm
 And not granting res judicata effect does indeed diminish the incentive for plaintiffs to adopt these alternative (superior) approaches.But the Court of Appeal nonetheless thinks that these counterarguments as a whole don't justify doing an injustice and depriving plaintiffs of their day in court.And I get that. [read post]