Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,613
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 3:06 pm
Since the Copyright Board was born out of concern about “super monopolies” expressed by the late great Judge Parker in 1935, the possible adaptation of a “consent decree” model in Canada under the aegis of the Competition Tribunal is something that merits serious exploration. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
Circuit sat en banc to hear argument in a pair of cases concerning when the House (or one of its committees) has Article III standing to seek relief in federal court. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:37 am
Ahmadi (4 May 2009), Vancouver Registry S061583 (B.C.S.C.), where the trial judge’s investigation into complaints of juror misconduct revealed that one of the jurors, during deliberations, had expressed concern that a high damage award would drive up their own auto insurance rates. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:00 pm
(Spicy IP) Kenya enacts Biosafety Act 2/2009 regulating activities in GMOs, establishing National Biosafety Authority (Afro-IP) US: BIO meets the press: economic health of the biotech industry; follow-on biologics; patent reform (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Intellectual Property Watch) US: Obama touts generic biologics to lower drug costs (Law360) US: Genentech announces victory in Cabilly re-examination (Patent Docs) US: Federal judge rejects Scruggs family’s bid to… [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 10:42 am
You can see the e-mails here, and the judge’s decision here; I also quote the judge’s decision below: State v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 7:17 am
May 3, 2018), a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
Golden's claims.In re: TASHANNA B. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 4:34 am
Analysis Re-Exports and Non-U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 9:00 am
Here are just some common areas of inquiry (FAQS) you’re likely to encounter: Has a healthcare provider ever said anything about your drinking? [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
We're okay with all of it. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 5:36 pm
You’re bullshitting the people you’re turning over. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:00 pm
Here’s Judge Kozinski’s concurring opinion, signed on to by five of the 11 judges on the en banc panel: Can a single non-responsive answer by a grand jury witness support a conviction for obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:05 am
“We’re in the same position on August 11 or August 17,” Thomas asserts. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:31 am
As far as I'm concerned, that's all a good thing. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
The appropriate inquiry is if a confidential relationship existed, did the parties deal on terms and conditions of equality? [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:34 pm
Illinois Brick did indeed concern prudential concerns. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Even federal judges, many of whom arrive steeped in the system of state common law, are not immune to this reaction.We don't think that's right, but we're realists enough to know that it happens. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 9:11 am
The instances must be judged on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:53 am
You’re running a restaurant — or maybe a mosque or an abortion clinic. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 10:26 am
In re Elysium Health-Chromadex Litig., 2018 WL 4907590, No. 17 Civ. 7394 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
