Search for: "In Re Jans" Results 541 - 560 of 6,579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 9:59 am
You can reach Jan at 678-485-6526 or visit her website is www.housecleaningonwheels.com. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 12:46 pm by Chris Williams
From now on, when folks say they're here to 'Protect and Serve,' please clarify who and what. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:00 am by Kevin Couch
In In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, No. 09-1205, 2010 WL 21090 (8th Cir. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:00 am by Idaho Estate Planning
There are just some cases where you wish you could be there to see the look on the Judge's face when they hear a defense, and one such recent case can be found in re Gordon, ___ F.Supp.2d ____, 2012 WL 255274 (N.D.Ga., Jan. 24, 2012). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:00 am by Unknown
Here’s how the laws will work and what they mean for Australia’s detention system (The Conversation, Dec. 2023) [text]Reports & journal articles:"You’re going to die here": Abuse in Abu Salim and Ain Zara detention centres, Briefing Note (Médecins Sans Frontières, Dec. 2023) [text]- Focuses on Libya. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 7:24 am by Kate Fort
Not sure what’s going on, but here are the (unpublished) cases so far this year: In re King/Koon7-Jan2020Court of AppealsGrand TraverseMichiganUnNoticeIn re K. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
See, eg, this entry from 12/12/07 titled "Suggestions to improve COA postings," this entry from 1/4/08 (which begins "The ILB has not heard back from its messages yesterday to the Indiana Clerk's Office re problems with the new format of the five opinions issued Jan. 3 and presumably all those to follow. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 8:24 am by Kamran Salour and Melinda L. McLellan
This aptly describes the Supreme Court’s Jan. 21, 2020, decision to deny Facebook’s writ of certiorari in In Re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy Litigation. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 11:20 am
Ah, the difficulties of getting divorced as a high-income couple in Orange County.The trial court was wrong, and Justice Rylaarsdam (and the rest of the panel) is right. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 4:42 pm
I sympathize with the trial court in this one.It's a marital dissolution proceeding, the ex-wife is proceeding pro per (having failed to pay her lawyer), and she repeatedly demands that the trial date be moved -- even in the midst of trial -- based upon her bipolar disorder. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:15 pm
One of the downsides of being an attorney is that if you get divorced and litigate the case, the details of your personal life -- or at least your financial life, and well as your interactions with your spouse concerning these matters -- may be set forth in a publication read by your colleages. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 1:46 pm
First off, congratulations to the attorneys at Sheppard Mullin for getting the Ninth Circuit to grant a mandamus petition. [read post]