Search for: "In Re Stanford"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2010, 10:05 pm
This bill purports to re-define state corporate law to make un-voted expenditures a violation of the corporation’s fiduciary duty to its shareholders. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
Scott Shackelford has posted The Tragedy of the Common Heritage of Mankind (Stanford Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 28, no. 1, February 2009). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
A degree of consumer stupidity we’re not prepared to tolerate. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 2:27 pm
Social media professor of Stanford and Berkeley Howard Rheingold discusses the affect of the Internet Age on Public Policy in this video discussion: [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:15 am
At issue in the case is whether, when a person is re-sentenced after having obtained federal habeas relief from an earlier sentence, a claim in a federal habeas petition challenging that new sentencing judgment is a “second or successive” claim under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:15 am
So if you're interested in joining the office, I recommend that you attend one of a relatively small number of law schools, including, interestingly enough, Fordham. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 11:41 am
Stanford (U.S.) 18. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 3:38 am
Jacobson says he's never had such a request: "What they're saying is absolutely false. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:05 pm
We’re excited to welcome back Professor Helen Norton as a guest blogger. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 6:40 am
If you're at all like me, you have a tendency to subscribe enthusiastically to listserves and distribution lists. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 10:24 am
Mary's 20, Fordham 12, 1930 Oregon State Agricultural College 0, Southern California 0, 1933 Columbia 7, Stanford 0, 1934 Rose Bowl Nevada 9, St. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 12:56 pm
But they're our readers' clear favorites, and we'll of course respect the results. [read post]
4 May 2008, 11:20 pm
Most of the time, Warren Buffet’s activities, when unrelated to Gen Re, fall outside the Law Blog’s long-arm jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
If you don't believe that statement, go re-read section 1 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts. [read post]
12 May 2010, 5:59 am
They're even more absurd when coming from people who took the opposite view when it was politically expedient. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:14 am
J'avais mentionné l'été dernier l'existence de deux polars juridiques s'intéressant au monde des brevets.Parmi eux, "A Patent Lie" de Paul Goldstein vient d'être édité en format "poche".Paul Goldstein est professeur de droit de la PI Ã … [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:46 am
"(...)Stanford professor Mark Lemley, a noted patent lawyer involved in two of the recent Supreme Court cases, sees the legal landscape changing even within his classroom. [read post]
23 May 2021, 5:10 am
"From the last paragraph of a NYT article by a Wellesley professor of social sciences and political science (Jennifer Chudy) and a Stanford polisci prof (Hakeem Jefferson). [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
By the time Weaver re-filed his petition, AEDPA was already in effect. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:11 am
Zambrano, Assistant Professor of Law, Stanford Law School For years now, the concept of a “Brussels Effect” on global companies has become widely accepted. [read post]
