Search for: "In Re a & M Operating Co., Inc."
Results 541 - 560
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2015, 4:47 am
The law itself didn’t define “signage” or “advertising,” and applied to any non-exempt “[m]anufacturer” who produces, sells, distributes, or licenses GE products that are sold in or into Vermont, with no requirement that the signage and advertising occur in Vermont. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:49 am
CEO Patrick M. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
Texas Supreme Court continues to exempt an entire industry (the legal profession) from civil liability; lets attorneys and law firms profit from lawsuits brought to hold them accountable for wrongdoing. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 3:00 am
A similar scheme happened at Axor Experts-Conseils Inc. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
Justice KG BalakrishnanThe Supreme Court in Selvi & Ors. v State of Karnataka has examined the law relating to the involuntary administration of certain scientific techniques, namely narcoanalysis, polygraph examination and the Brain Electrical Activation Profile (BEAP) test for the purpose of improving investigation efforts in criminal cases. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
Chowdhury's proposed final judgment would impose a sizable judgment against the whole Prenda team: It is hereby ORDRED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant Chowdhury recover jointly and severally from Plaintiff AF Holdings, Inc., Prenda Law, Inc., John L. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
As the Supreme Court wrote in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Noting that legislation, regulation, international accords, business trends, and physical impacts of climate change could all affect a registrant’s operations or results, the release “remind[ed] companies of their obligations under existing federal securities laws” “to consider climate change and its consequences as they prepare documents to be filed with us and provided to investors. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
”[2] The time is indeed ripe for us to re-examine how we assess bank mergers under the statutory framework that Congress has enacted. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 2:28 pm
Levine and Judges Robert M. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
The list includes multiple Wall Street billionaires and investors, a Facebook co-founder, a shipping magnate, and the heir to a family fortune dating back to the Gilded Age. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Because they're so useful! [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 11:25 am
Because they're so useful! [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you, Christina [Maguire], for that introduction and congratulations on becoming President and CEO of the Society [for Corporate Governance] (the “Society”) this past January. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
May an agency revive a defunct rulemaking without notice, and then immediately promulgate a lightly revised version of the proposed rule as a final rule? [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
” David Cole worries, however, that perhaps section 1021 will be seen as authorizing detention of individuals–particularly those determined to have “substantially supported” al Qaeda, the Taliban, or their co-belligerent forces–in circumstances inconsistent with longstanding law-of-war principles. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 6:52 pm
Employer and union group health plan sponsors and insurers of group and individual health plans (Health Plans) agonizing over 2014 plan design decisions are running out of time. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Proposition De Règlement Du Parlement Européen Et Du Conseil Concernant La Compétence Judiciaire, La Reconnaissance Et L'Exécution Des Décisions En Matière Civile Et Commerciale (Refonte) (Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Jurisdiction and [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 14-144 (involving a First Amendment challenge to license plate restrictions), and Bullard v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
Great rewards await those who can get past the labels to examine the substances beneath, and to that end, in this post I’ll explain how the First Amendment implications of fair use operate doctrinally. [read post]
