Search for: "In re Application of Wells" Results 541 - 560 of 22,306
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2012, 3:55 am by Scott A. McKeown
Specification Crucial in Proper BRI Analysis It is well established that the USPTO applies a broadest reasonable claim interpretation to patent applications and patents subject to post issuance proceedings. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:44 am
To re-register, applicants must file form I-821 and I-765, Application for Employment Authorization. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
On the same day the fee for re-establishment as well as the renewal fee for the third year together with the additional fee were paid. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:08 am
In re Positec Group Limited, Serial No. 77920346 (September 13, 2013) [precedential].The Board first noted that although applicant's identification of goods includes tools other than "jaws" or gripping devices, a mark is deemed merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1) if it describes even one of the identified goods." [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 3:11 am
In re The Country Vintner, Serial No. 85567206 (October 8, 2014) [not precedential].Both applicant and the examining attorney agreed that the genus of the services at issue is "wholesale distributorship featuring wine. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 5:07 am
We are discussing the loss causation analysis in In re Williams Securities Litigation. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:53 am by Abby Wein
  Always make sure that you’re allowed to consider the information that you’re accessing in the pre-employment context. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:15 am by Adrian Lurssen
Drop us a line if you're interested; or, please, spread the word if you know someone who might fit well with any one of these positions: sales executive, programmer, designer, writer/editor, and executive assistant. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 5:50 am by Suraj Vyas
The Act plans to have more exceptions by April 2021 so it’s important you’re up to date on the latest.If you haven’t already, make sure you’re in compliance by removing criminal history questions from your job applications and update any handbooks or procedures to ensure you aren’t asking about criminal history until that first in-person interview. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:32 am
One that may well, again, correctly interpret California precedent.I have some extended thoughts about the amendment as well, but they're a bit too involved for a blog post. [read post]