Search for: "In re Case"
Results 541 - 560
of 164,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 8:58 pm
Defendants removed the case from state [...] [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:59 pm
But, in In re Queen's University at Kingston, the Federal Circuit decided the question in the affirmative. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 2:14 pm
Albeit belatedly.When your case is (as here) very similar to another published opinion by the Court of Appeal, when you're going the other way than that other (published) opinion, and when your opinion critiques the reasoning (or lack thereof) of that prior opinion, then, yeah, you should published your opinion.Or at least that's my view. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:39 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court has finally handed down its decision in In Re AJR--a step-parent adoption case. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:03 pm
The Court of Appeals decision in In re Beck seemed consistent with the previous line of cases on the subject: Bradley v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 7:39 am
The re-sentencing of this case was handled by Assistant U.S. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 6:45 pm
., October 26, 2016) (affirming dismissal of Rusk's discrimination/retaliation claim as barred by sovereign immunity)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 7:02 pm
., September 13, 2016) (vacating dismissal of federal suit: the pending state-court action did not preclude the parallel federal-court action)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:23 am
., November 23, 2016) (affirming summary judgment in favor of Sprint: Lancaster failed to timely serve process and unwarrantedly sought indeterminate leave under the ADA) *Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 2:17 am
., January 9, 2017) (affirming summary judgement in favor of Mini Mart on Johnston's ADA claim; Johnston raised no genuine issues of material fact)*Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 6:57 am
However, in today's day and age, virtual property is the new IP, so we're adding the case to our tracking list, and will keep you posted. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:53 am
If it decides the case with no new factual record, then the value of Stone & Downer is significantly undercut and customs litigants will lose some of the safety net the option to re-litigate has provided.There is certainly more to follow on this case. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 1:12 pm
You can view or download the case here: In re Morrow © 2011, Melinda Deel. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:37 pm
Circuit, Case No. 10-1142. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 8:43 am
If you’re involved in a personal injury case in Florida, or you believe you have a case and are considering approaching a personal injury lawyer about it, there are some common terms you’ll likely hear. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 10:09 am
If you're (1) an attorney in San Diego, (2) have a heavily litigated (and somewhat nasty) divorce case, (3) the merits of which involve extensive disclosure of your (and your ex-wife's) assets and property settlement agreement, and (4) not only lost but were sanctioned $5000 below, one of the bad things that can happen on appeal is that you lose your appeal in a published decision.Richard Corona knows what I mean.This isn't a great result for the ex-wife either, mind… [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 9:48 am
In granting summary judgment in a defective beer bottle case (where the injuries seemed insignificant), a Maryland court provides a review of the res ipsa loquitur doctrine in California, including a review of what is usually the biggest battle ground in making a res ipsa case: whether the defendant had exclusive control. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
on commonly held misconceptions concerning I-9 re-verification. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 6:42 am
The Lead Presiding Judge on the South Eastern Circuit has described the complaints of defence barristers about who was to preside over the re-trial of case against a number of Sun journalists as “absurd” and “misconceived”. [read post]
24 May 2021, 4:21 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
