Search for: "In re Christopher J."
Results 541 - 560
of 756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2016, 10:00 pm
Salmonella must know where it is in a body to survive, reported graduate student Christopher J. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 6:00 am
., on Sunday, September 29, 2019 Tags: Compensation disclosure, Equity-based compensation, Executive Compensation, Incentives, Pay for performance, Stock options Acquisitions of Public Companies—2018 Shareholder Litigation Posted by Ravi Sinha and Per Axelson, Cornerstone Research, on Monday, September 30, 2019 Tags: Delaware cases, Delaware law, Filings, In re Trulia, Jurisdiction, Merger… [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:31 pm
A unique development model “The model created through the development of this vaccine is groundbreaking and could not have been accomplished without the joint efforts of the African Ministers of Health and the many partners and collaborators around the world,” said Dr Christopher J. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 11:07 am
Murphy Governor The Honorable Craig J. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
").The UK magazine History Today offers short reviews of The Origins of the English Parliament, 924-1327 (Oxford University Press), by J. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:20 pm
Oliver on Free Movement of Goods in the European Union (Fifth Edition), is still happily edited by Peter J Oliver, but with the support of a small army of contributors: Stefan Enchelmaier, Malcolm Jarvis, Angus Johnston, Sven Norberg, Christopher Stothers and Stephen Weatherill. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 9:07 pm
J. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:12 pm
See Memorandum for Christopher H. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Barnett of the University of Georgia Law School and Christopher J. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:15 am
Ambassador J. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 3:25 pm
Christopher’s article, Whack-A-Mole: Why Prosecuting Digital Currency Exchanges Won’t Stop Online Money Laundering, was cited in the following article: Lawrence J. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 2:31 pm
Re: Wrapped Reichstag, Berlin, 1971-1995 Control No. 60-504-9973 Decision of Appeals Board, U.S. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm
Boyd, Associate Professor at the University of Georgia School of Public and International Affairs, and Christopher J. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
FLASHBACK FRIDAY In an essay in The Regulatory Review, Patricia J. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:15 am
See In re Lutz Biedermann. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming article in the North Carolina Law Review, Victoria J. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 12:29 pm
Irwin [sic] J. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
Kay J. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 7:12 am
These days he has a roommate, Eli J. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
