Search for: "In re GARLAND"
Results 541 - 560
of 807
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2016, 4:58 am
” Additional commentary comes from Tara Goldshan in Vox, who observes that “McCain is directly stating something that the public has known all along — that the argument against Garland is not about democracy but ideology,” and in an op-ed in The Arizona Republic, where E.J. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am
” Katie Reilly reports in Time that in an interview with Charlie Rose, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg “stressed the importance of having nine justices on the Supreme Court” and noted that the Senate could still confirm Chief Judge Merrick Garland in a lame-duck session after the election. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:08 am
Couric also asked Ginsburg about the Garland nomination. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 7:25 am
Were I Hillary Clinton I'd be inclined to simply re-nominate Judge Garland, but there are other intriguing possibilities. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 4:17 am
They’re needed in boring cases, which aren’t that boring to the people who live with the consequences, and in the sorts of cases that cause seismic change. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am
“You’re not very valuable to people if you can’t make up your mind. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:37 am
As a technical matter, Obama could re-nominate Garland on January 4 during the two weeks in which he remains president after the new Congress is sworn in, but that is highly unlikely, because the Senate would not act before the next president took office on January 20. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:41 am
In the QuadCity Times, Erin Murphy reports on the results of an Iowa poll showing that a majority of Iowa voters believe that the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley, who is up for re-election in November, should hold confirmation hearings on the nomination of Judge Garland. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:22 am
At CNN, Ariane de Vogue reports on the factors that might lead to Garland’s confirmation if Hillary Clinton wins in November, including the prospect of Senate action in a lame-duck session and the possibility that “if Clinton were to win, she may not want to engage in an immediate battle royale over the Supreme Court,” but might instead re-nominate the “eminently qualified” Garland and wait for other opportunities to dramatically reshape the… [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 3:50 am
Do not recklessly lure them into danger and that is what happened in Garland, Texas at the Muhammad cartoon contest,” she said. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 2:59 am
Judge Garland is Jewish, as are three of the current justices. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 11:16 am
To wait until the next president is sworn in, and hope that a President Hillary Clinton would re-submit Judge Garland’s name for the empty seat, carries substantial risk as well. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 10:01 pm
Will a Justice Garland help a renaissance in class actions? [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 12:10 am
In The Wall Street Journal, Kristina Peterson reports on recent comments by Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, who told reporters that “he expected Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton would re-nominate Merrick Garland for the U.S. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
But they’re also ideals shared, at that level of abstraction, by most non-libertarians in American politics today. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:21 pm
But they're also ideals shared, at that level of abstraction, by most non-libertarians in American politics today. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 5:59 am
[The Hill] * "What we're seeing is a sort of shift around social norms. [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 10:43 am
Garland, a forced arbitration clause is “a common provision” that exists “for the benefit of all parties to the arbitration. [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 10:43 am
Garland, a forced arbitration clause is “a common provision” that exists “for the benefit of all parties to the arbitration. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:13 am
We’re rooting for you, UB Grads. [read post]
