Search for: "In re McConnell" Results 541 - 560 of 883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2010, 2:59 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Not likely, because they’re all perceived as smart, well-respected constitutional scholars and judges. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:14 am by SHG
They’re our problem, a national problem, a federal problem. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:35 pm by WIMS
Res. 44 (Roll Call 153), and by 74 percent of the American public according to recent opinion polls. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 2:26 pm
"That takes approximately five seconds to establish if you're going after an Iraqi insurgent. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 1:41 pm by Josh Blackman
And while we're at it, I've long thought that the Rules Enabling Act violates the Non-Delegation Doctrine. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 3:31 am by SHG
In other words, the outcome in the Senate is a foregone conclusion, according to McConnell. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 9:08 am by Matt Sundquist
  However, Citizens United began as a challenge by a non-profit regarding a pay-per-view movie; until the Court ordered re-hearing, the broader challenge to McConnell, Austin, or the McCain-Feingold Act was not before it. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
At Stanford Lawyer’s Legal Aggregate, Michael McConnell discusses the March 23 oral argument in Zubik v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:40 am by JB
  The Justices asked for evidence of original understanding in the re-argument to Brown v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 3:41 pm by Sandy Levinson
  This was illustrated by his desire in fact to withdraw from the wars we're currently conducting. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 10:33 am by Matthew Harwood
Now we understand at least some of these implications – and they’re chilling. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 5:03 am by Michael C. Dorf
Gamblers who take the points can win even if their team loses but beats the spread; beating the spread does little for the team itself--and we're all the team in this metaphor. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:20 pm by Sandy Levinson
 Collins has no excuse whatsoever for her submission to the tyranny of Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 12:38 pm by Sandy Levinson
 There is no excuse for his entourage of enablement, including people like Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:22 am by kblocher@hslf.org
Supporters of the bill are pressing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to get the bill over the finish line this Congress. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 2:27 pm by Mark Jaycox
That's why we're asking users to continue emailing their Senators to stop this bill. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Neither Dems taking the US House nor a few extra R senators should affect the ability of Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to muster 60 votes, given substantial Democratic support, so nothing should change on that front. [read post]