Search for: "In re Oliver" Results 541 - 560 of 1,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2007, 5:32 am
Holden "NantucketBoy" Oliver* isn't as busy, and is nicely holding down the blog fort. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:29 am by Ben
But, we’re heartened that our case makes some good new law for future cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 2:12 pm
  That's time and effort (and money) that can't be spent on what you're ordinarily doing, and it creates standing.So the principle that Judge McKeown espouses seems just wrong as a categorical matter. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 7:30 am by Gus Hurwitz
But Dirk, like Oliver, does miss perhaps the most important point. [read post]
26 May 2010, 2:59 am
"This is what we're hired to do, to get out there and teach. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 3:29 am by SHG
I’m speaking of Jason Aldean and Oliver Anthony. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
Oliver Wendell Holmes was on the Massachusetts bench, and New York had Cardozo. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
When you remember that Ordinary People beat out Raging Bull for Best Picture, that Oliver! [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 12:20 pm
In the context of examining whether such a process is excluded from patentability as being "essentially biological" within the meaning of Article 53(b) EPC, it is not relevant whether a step of a technical nature is a new or known measure, whether it is trivial or a fundamental alteration of a known process, whether it does or could occur in nature or whether the essence of the invention lies in it.There is, of course, much reasoning behind the answers, some of which has already been… [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 5:01 am
(TTABlogged here).In re Cheezwhse.com, Inc., Serial Nos. 78711311 and 78730624 (October 29, 2007) [not precedential]. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]