Search for: "In re Poke"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
It is very easy for things to go wrong: to hit the wrong target, to ignore the real source of attacks, to do collateral damage, to poke the hornets' nest. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
According to her, all of the other copyrights involved have expired either due to time or lack of re-registration. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
We’re in recess. [read post]
30 May 2013, 5:29 am
No longer an owner of this house, I step out of the shower this morning to find a tree guy poking around in our back yard. [read post]
19 May 2013, 9:42 pm
This claim surprised me, so I poked around for other posts by Will Nobilis, and, behold! [read post]
17 May 2013, 12:10 pm
CAN YOU PLEASE STOP POKING AT ME WITH A NEEDLE AND ACTING LIKE IT'S NO BIG DEAL BECAUSE I REALLY FREAKING HATE IT. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:22 am
So, you’re on your way home from work when somebody behind you, distracted by their cell phone, slams into the back of your car. [read post]
13 May 2013, 12:57 am
So, if INTA is an industry bear, Ron, consider it poked (more than a few times). [read post]
10 May 2013, 10:55 am
Also, when you’re unfamiliar with a state’s law, let a bright associate do some poking around. [read post]
8 May 2013, 9:48 am
Incontestability wouldn't overcome the serious genericism problem it faces; but if you're going to wait six years to bring a suit, why not wait a few more months to get the limited benefits of incontestability....before poking at giants who will deploy massive resources to destroy the trademark? [read post]
2 May 2013, 6:12 am
We’re hardly alone. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 11:02 pm
Holding it between his legs and poking people with it like a fully automatic winky doo? [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 9:20 am
The only thing that came to mind was something like cutting someone’s telephone line when you’re in a feud with them? [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 8:07 am
So, in part to save Bexis from having to address these with many others in his roundup, we re-enter the blogging fray with a post that attempts to tie together these decisions in something somewhat coherent. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:17 pm
In re Egebjerg, 574 F.3d at 1049 – 50. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
And the Smucker’s brand has had success poking fun at it’s own name as though it were a handicap. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 3:42 pm
We’re off to a good start. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 7:42 am
Of course, Cardinal George had to poke his nose into it and call upon his supporters to fight against equal rights. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 6:12 am
You can poke around for admissions data, costs, or employment outcomes. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:57 am
The court points to the fact that the state’s own assessment process classified a chunk of the offenders as having a “low to moderate” risk of re-offending. [read post]
