Search for: "In re TM"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,023
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2013, 2:49 pm
Normally TM would be withdrawn after opposition; clinic gives ability to persist. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:10 pm
McKenna: are copyright claims addons to TM claims in these 30% where they’re together, or vice versa? [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:07 am
TM doctrine: if you’re wealthy enough to conduct a survey and don’t, we weigh the absence of a survey against you. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
Lisa Ramsey, Reconciling Trademark Rights and Free Speech Locally and Globally Commentator: Rebecca Tushnet International element to the question of how to limit trademark to protect free speech. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 3:01 pm
Would also benefit from broader discussion of economics of design patents: they’re weird hybrids where you get briefly very strong copyright/TM-like protection better than either of them. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 10:05 am
In TM, similar potential dichotomy. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 9:36 am
A: they’re happy for it to remain illegal. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) Issue #1: TM+50. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 8:32 am
IPAB re-affirmed the aforesaid position in the Instant Order. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Everyman really does have that tattoo on his knuckles; (2) these are clearly distinct goods/services; and (3) if you’re someone who tends to see trademark bullying everywhere you look, could you have picked a victim with a better name than Everyman? [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:43 am
General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:33 am
Similarly, disclosures are zero-sum: less package real estate to create the emotional connections the TM owner wants to create, so Brennan-Marquez’s distinction seems unsustainable to me. [read post]
4 May 2013, 7:40 am
But I think TM scholars generally agree that TM/free speech nexus is a mess: some courts weigh speech against confusion even though they're incommensurable, others don’t; there are 3 different free speech tests depending on what you’re doing. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:20 am
| Canadian artists hoping royalty regime will be in federal budget http://ow.ly/iWShY Alert re phishing scam – email pretending to be Canada Revenue Agency advising email recipient is eligible for a tax refund. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 7:20 am
| Canadian artists hoping royalty regime will be in federal budget http://ow.ly/iWShY Alert re phishing scam – email pretending to be Canada Revenue Agency advising email recipient is eligible for a tax refund. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 8:24 am
Whether you’re whining or winning, guests can enjoy the cocktails at the Pool Bar & Grill and Hokulea Lounge. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 1:56 pm
Bone: reason that unfair competition became coextensive w/TM was that there was no longer normative justification for excluding subject matter from TM. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
Be stricter about TM use. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Though we may call §43(a) claims unfair competition, because they’re subject to all the same rules as registered TMs, we don’t really think about the differences. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 3:38 pm
Q: TM? [read post]
