Search for: "In the Matter of Estate of Miller"
Results 541 - 560
of 902
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2010, 4:06 am
To see why that matters, let’s go back to my Indeterminacy article, linked above (footnotes omitted): In Miller v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 2:00 pm
Powerhouse: The Untold Story of Hollywood's Creative Artists Agency by James Andrew Miller (2016)17. [read post]
28 May 2010, 8:52 am
., according to UHS CEO Alan Miller. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:49 am
The right candidate will have the opportunity to work on cases in a variety of areas including constitutional law, environmental law, real estate, employment, tax issues, corporate/business matters, and complex federal, state and tribal court litigation at both trial and appellate levels. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 12:21 pm
The Bankruptcy Code does not define "adverse" interest, but several courts have explained that any “economic interest that tends to lessen the value of the bankruptcy estate” or “predisposition under circumstances that renders a bias against the estate” would be an interest against the estate. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 3:59 pm
City of Wildomar (Walmart Real Estate Business Trust, Real Party in Interest) (4th Dist., Div. 2, 2017) _____ Cal.App.5th _____. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
The district court granted summary judgment to Elmwood and Miller, holding as a matter of law that estoppel could not be applied to excuse thefailure to meet the numerical threshold.This case presents two questions in the context of an action under COBRA. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:55 am
38; and (3) due process, all as a matter of law. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:56 pm
The California Supreme Court on November 26, 2019 entered its order denying the depublication requests and declining to review the matter on its own motion. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:14 am
Per the Court: “The purpose of the exhaustion doctrine is to ensure public agencies are given the opportunity to decide matters within their expertise, respond to objections, and correct any errors before the courts intervene. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 12:24 pm
The Court of Appeal’s Opinion SMARA Claim The Court first held as a matter of law that SMARA’s statutory “statement of reasons” requirement did not apply to the County’s wildlife migration corridor overlay zoning ordinance Project because enacting an ordinance changing permitting requirements did not constitute “permitting a use” under the statute’s plain meaning. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:35 am
., failure to analyze consistency with the 2005 Executive Order; failure to adequately address GHG mitigation; failure to analyze a reasonable range of project alternatives; failure to adequately analyze and mitigate air quality and particulate matter pollution impacts; and understating agricultural land impacts. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:20 pm
SB 743 was enacted in 2013 to further California’s efforts to reduce GHG emissions by encouraging transit-oriented, infill development – a strategy announced in SB 375, the “Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act of 2008. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:22 am
The opinion reaches the same general conclusion as the Court of Appeal’s previous opinion in the matter (my blog post on which can be found here) – i.e., that BAAQMD’s 2010 Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC) Thresholds of Significance (i.e., for air pollutants including TACs and PM 2.5) are not facially invalid, because not invalid in all their potential applications. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 10:14 am
Per the Court: “The purpose of the exhaustion doctrine is to ensure public agencies are given the opportunity to decide matters within their expertise, respond to objections, and correct any errors before the courts intervene. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 10:51 am
The statute’s last sentence, however, expressly permits a lead agency to determine that a resource is a historical resource even when it is neither deemed (as a mandatory matter) nor presumed (subject to rebuttal by a preponderance of the evidence) to be a historical resource under the statute. [read post]
23 May 2024, 4:54 pm
In an opinion filed April 18, and belatedly ordered published on May 15, 2024, the Third District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s order discharging the peremptory writ of mandate that was issued following the Court of Appeal’s earlier direction in Save Our Capitol! [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:22 pm
” Applying these “murky” CEQA principles to the case before it, and reviewing the matter independently as an issue of law, the Court found the Park Project was properly treated as separate from the NBR Project for CEQA purposes. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm
” The EIR’s definition of urban decay was not “unnaturally constrained” and, as a matter of law, it did not err in failing to treat “loss of close and convenient shopping” as a significant environmental impact. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:29 am
NOTE TO CONSUMERS: As a matter of Firm policy, JMBM does not represent individual consumers who have disputes with their lenders. [read post]
