Search for: "In the Matter of Roberts" Results 541 - 560 of 18,548
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
In addition, Justices Roberts, Breyer, and Sotomayor concluded in Brunetti that the government could ban registration of matter that is scandalous without violating the First Amendment as long as the trademark law targeted marks that are obscene, vulgar, or profane. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:59 am by Charles Geyh
 Federal law imposes disqualification requirements on the Supreme Court, the constitutionality of which Chief Justice John Roberts has called untested and Justice Samuel Alito has rejected. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 7:04 am by Russell Knight
“Illinois law prohibits the parties’ oral postnuptial agreement regarding [matters addressed in the]…superseding the [prenuptial] Agreement. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:49 am by Jack Sharman
The specs come from Death & Company, Modern Classic Cocktails; Robert Simonson, The Martini Cocktail; and Day, Fauchald, and Caplan, The Cocktail Codex. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 12:59 pm by Ashley Belanger
This latest X advertiser scare followed two Media Matters reports of ads appearing next to antisemitic content. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 8:45 am by sim1koh2
It does not matter what day or time it is, Shimon gets back to you. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
 Researching whether the persons responsible for Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment thought the president was an officer of the United States is a bit like researching whether George Washington had five fingers on his right hand. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
Counsel can obviously not guarantee how a case will turn out no matter how strong the lawyers may predict the merits of a case. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:13 am by Jon Hyman
At the end of the day, that’s all that matters. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
How the Supreme Court Settled on an Ethics Code – and What It Left Out MSN – Ann Marimow and Robert Barnes (Washington Post) | Published: 11/15/2023 Supreme Court justices stung by controversies over the court’s ethics pledged to follow a broad code of conduct promoting “integrity and impartiality,” but without a way to enforce its standards against those who fall short. [read post]