Search for: "Jacobs v. Marks" Results 541 - 560 of 569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2008, 4:42 am
We now have a decision, and it may prove to be quite an important shift in the practice at the Intellectual Property Office.The case is Astron Clinica Ltd & Others v The Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2008] EWHC 85 (Pat) . [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),IBM patents and defensive publishing: (Securing Innovation),Stockholm Network paper on developing nations and pharmaceutical patents: (IPcentral Weblog),Good and bad news for the IP industry if recession does bite: (IAM),Business Software Alliance: Piracy economic impact is tens of billions of dollars: (Ars Technica),IP portfolio costs - when less is more: (IP ThinkTank),IP protection: Competitive market default: (The Fire… [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
The Board unconvincingly distinguished Jacobs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 10:57 pm
For those who prefer briefs to boxers, a periodic collection of fashionable events in the judicial system:Bar(red): Gap appeals South African trademark decisionSuffer the children: Gap under fire for abusive child labor in IndiaShe sees France: Paris Hilton sued for stealing panty-flasher's styleBay watch: Ninth Circuit sends PerfumeBay to watery grave in dilution caseContradiction in terms: Dueling Unique clothing firms in expensive trademark disputeBlind Alley: North Face wins damages in… [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:39 am
The Court of Justice put an end to it (or virtually so) with Gat v Luk. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 5:45 am
Rather belatedly passing on an interesting case I picked up on my Lawtel update a few days ago about getting an injunction in comparative advertising cases (Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd v Vetplus Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 584 CA (Civ Div) (Pill LJ, Longmore LJ, Jacob LJ) 20/6/2007). [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 5:14 am
Merpel says, I spotted that Jacob LJ called for the repeal of the Trade Marks Act 1994, s.10(6) - but, if it has no effect, why bother? [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 4:48 pm
This issue leads with a note by Herman Cohen Jehoram on a case that the poor Kat is really struggling to understand as a legal proposition - G-Star v Benetton (the Elwood jeans case). [read post]
25 May 2007, 6:52 am
This week saw the ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in Experience Hendrix LLC v Purple Haze Records Ltd and others [2007] EWCA Civ 501, a decision of Lords Justices Keene, Jacob and Toulson on Thursday 24 May 2007.Musical megastar Jimi Hendrix (left), a US citizen, gave performances between 1967 and his death in 1970 in (among other places) the UK, Sweden and the USA. [read post]
21 May 2007, 4:24 pm
Last Friday, Jacob Goldstein had this post at the WSJ.com Health Blog about the aftereffects of the Court's KSR patent ruling. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:58 pm
Today, Mark H. [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:41 pm
Jacob LJ, in a leading judgment delivered today in the Court of Appeal in Intel v CPM, has referrred a number of questions on s.5(3) TMA 1994/Art.4(4)(a) Directive 89/104 to the ECJ. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 6:02 pm
On July 31, 2006, a unanimous Federal Trade Commission (“Commission” or “FTC”) ruled that Rambus Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:02 am
The Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sir Andrew Morritt C and Lords Justices Jacob and Lloyd) has given its decision in Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd; Nova Productions Ltd v Bell Fruit Games Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 219, an appeal from the decision of Kitchin J which was noted by the IPKat here.In short, this appeal concerned two actions. [read post]