Search for: "James v. United States (two Cases)"
Results 541 - 560
of 2,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
If this were not the rule, the Court tells us, “the laws, the treaties, and the constitution of the United States would be different in different states, and might, perhaps, never have precisely the same construction, obligation, or efficacy, in any two states. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
Based on the first two priors, I think the Court got the case right, and that its countermajoritarian instincts here are a sign of strength in the decision, not weakness. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:56 am
United States (1926) case, and ran across a small thing I thought some readers might appreciate, reflecting how very different Supreme Court practice is today than it was a century ago.The case, of course, involved an important constitutional question: whether Congress can give the Senate a role in the removal of an inferior officer. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 7:52 am
Delia and United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Two Paths to a Constitutional Amendment The Constitution’s Article V provides two paths to amend the Constitution. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 10:28 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 1:42 pm
United States: Whether to overrule the “separate sovereign” exception to the double jeopardy clause; Nieves v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
” From the Introduction: On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Of the two million or so people who work in the executive branch, more than 99% of them are employees under current Supreme Court case law.The text of Article II does give to the President the sole power to remove all principal, superior, inferior, and recess appointed officers of the United States except for Article III judges. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:27 am
Bruen, in which the court struck down New York’s handgun-licensing scheme, the justices will hear argument in another major gun-rights case: United States v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:37 pm
Respondent James Dimaya is a lawful permanent resident of the United States with two convictions for first-degree burglary under California law. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:13 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 3:12 am
At the Fed Soc Blog, James Burnham discusses United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court has held that even if Congress has not expressly preempted state laws – or if express preemption is not determinative because the “loophole” might apply – state laws relating to a particular subject matter may be implicitly preempted in some cases. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:17 am
The two other cases form interesting bookends, metaphorically speaking. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 11:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
United States, must come from the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 9:08 am
The case is American Tradition Partnership v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:32 pm
In United National Insurance Company v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
” Additional coverage of the grant in the two consolidated sports-betting cases, Christie v. [read post]
