Search for: "Jane Does 1-2"
Results 541 - 560
of 989
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2015, 1:51 pm
Click Jane Roes 1-2 v. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 6:55 am
Wells posted the opening statement by the chief prosecutor, Brigadier General Mark Martins, and then kept us updated on Monday’s proceedings (Session 1 and Session 2), in which it emerged that one of the defendants recognized a defense team translator from his time in a CIA black site. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:24 am
The Manager(s) shall be: Jane Doe, John Doe and Yogi Berra. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:01 am
This is due primarily to the idea expression distinction. 6Accord Jane Ginsburg, Authors and Users in Copyright, 45 J. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:01 am
” At this point, we are particularly concerned with Jane Doe #1, #2 and most recently, Jane Doe #3 and #4. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 12:12 pm
(Contrast that with, say, someone watching “9 1/2 Weeks” on the lunch room television.) [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 10:10 am
The case is Jane Doe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
maybe not as much) and to a random sample of twitter users (do professors tweet different information than Katy Perry or Jane Doe? [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 7:38 am
Under the legal standard, "the permissibility of fees charged for the use of state facilities is evaluated under three prongs, which ask whether the fee (1) is based on some fair approximation of use of the facilities, (2) is not excessive in relation to the benefits conferred, and (3) does not discriminate against interstate commerce. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
But where does it come from? [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:15 am
Specifically, President Obama maintained that Palestine does not yet constitute a state, and thus cannot accede to the Rome Treaty. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Alan Dershowitz filed a motion to intervene in the victims rights lawsuit of Jane Does 1, 2 and 3 today. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 5:30 am
For greater certainty, Articles X.2 and X.3 do not apply to any obligation, commitment, undertaking, or requirement other than those set out in those articles. 2. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:56 pm
Legal costs:A.1 Stikeman Elliott LLP $ 123,580.98A.2 Christian Tacit $ 54,240.00B. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 6:13 am
Subsequently, the employer filed suit in state court against two building residents, Internet service providers, 20 anonymous John and Jane Does, and three former employees. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:54 am
My former law partner and long-time spouse Jane Coleman does. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 11:22 am
Research explored why firms made decisions to invest in development of public domain projects, finding 4 main rationales: 1) engagement with fan community of existing literary work, 2) use of public domain material to complement a technological platform or subscription service; 3) a conscious entrepreneurial strategy based on identification of existing demand and 4) partnership with a public institution to celebrate and engage the public about an event or anniversary of… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:31 pm
The latest event came last week when Mattel's motion to dismiss MGA's $ 1 billion trade secrets claim was denied by a Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 8:33 am
Stevenson's motion for summary judgment was granted as to Count 1, breach of the Non-Compete Provision, and Count 2, breach of the Non-Solicitation Provision. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 11:43 am
Non-tax consequences: See #2 immediately above. [read post]