Search for: "Jeans v. Jeans" Results 541 - 560 of 1,865
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Sekmadienis v Lithuania ([2018] ECHR 112) the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that a decision to fine a clothing company for the display of adverts referring to “Jesus” and “Mary” was a violation of Article 10. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 12:04 pm
This is essentially the issue that the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) had to address in Sekmadienis v Lithuania (Appl No 69317/14). [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
China is making slow but steady progress toward what western countries consider to be judicial independence (see authorities listed below). [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 2:12 pm by Pierre T. Nguyen
  Notre expert Jean-François Drolet commente : JFD : on ne peut pas dire que le club de hockey aura une victoire facile sur la glace du USPTO. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This was no more apparent than the Court’s decision in R. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
A Road not Taken: Select Committees and the Estimates, 1880–1904Colin Lee        Part V: The Lex Parliamentaria Revisited16. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 6:50 pm by Jean O'Grady
Shenkman, Senior Manager, KM Counsel & Research, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., Patrick V. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Thus, Gravano's and Lohan's claims that Take-Two impermissibly used their likeness in Grand Theft Auto V, or in material promoting Grand Theft Auto V, must fail. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]