Search for: "Jefferson v Long" Results 541 - 560 of 747
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2011, 7:59 am by David Bernstein
Carpenter, Flagrant Conduct: The Story of Lawrence v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm by Lawrence Solum
Jefferson's notion of public reason seems connected to an ideal of democratic government. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm by Don Cruse
This could spell some trouble for the taxpayers in Nestle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm by Don Cruse
This could spell some trouble for the taxpayers in Nestle USA, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:09 am by Kent Scheidegger
"  -- Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Judge Spencer Roane, Sept. 6, 1819. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:02 pm by Terry Hart
My answer was “Sure”, we should care what he thought about copyright, as long as we understand what he thought about it and place it in the correct context. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Sure, as long as his views are accorded the proper weight. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 2:30 pm
The decisions are Johnson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 10:38 am
Nonetheless, this feature of Marbury has long been criticized as an effort by CJ John Marshall to poke his rival (and distant cousin) Thomas Jefferson in the eye in a way that would not give Jefferson a way to poke back. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  There are posts about the decision, inter alia, Thomas Jefferson Center site and on the SCOTUS Blog. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am by John Mikhail
As a result, historians and jurists have long recognized the importance of Resolution VI for interpreting the conceptions of federalism that motivated the Founders. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am by Bill Merkel
Dicey (legislative omnipotence), Thomas Jefferson (departmentalism and active popular sovereignty that does not go dormant in non-Ackermanian moments), James Madison (a system of checks and balances reduced to a short code), or John Marshall (judicial supremacy based on an instrument that did not say a word about judicial supremacy when he wrote Marbury and continued silent on that point when his successors affixed each of their signatures to Aaron v. [read post]