Search for: "John Doe Holder"
Results 541 - 560
of 1,743
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm
In addition to Chairman Issa and Ranking Member Nadler, Representatives John Conyers (D-MI), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), Tom Rooney (R-FL), and Ted Deutch (D-FL) joined as original co-sponsors to the legislation. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:40 am
” Finally, with respect to the fourth factor, the court cited its 2010 ruling in Holder v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
Holder, in which the court held that U.S. copyright laws are constitutional and not subject to First Amendment scrutiny as long as Congress does not alter the traditional contours of protection, the Tam decision suggests that trademark laws are content-based regulations that should be subject to constitutional scrutiny when they regulate noncommercial expression or non-misleading commercial expression. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:10 am
If the bill does not pass, they expect U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:52 pm
Nixon, it does not apply to information related to criminal activity. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am
The copyright holder sent a “takedown notice” to YouTube, which then removed the video. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 7:57 pm
John G. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:22 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:27 am
The Sentencing Commission does not account for Rule 35(b) reductions. [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:00 am
Voltage had sought the identity of several “John Doe” suspected BitTorrent users but Rogers said they would only provide the information if Voltage agreed to pay a $100 CAD per hour fee for labor. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:12 am
Four of the plaintiffs (Paul Harrison, two John Does, and a Jane Doe) claim that Section 2(c) of the E.O. will “prolong their separation from their loved ones,” by preventing them from obtaining visas, while “several” of the plaintiffs claim that the anti-Muslim animus in the executive caused them “feelings of disparagement and exclusion. [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:43 pm
Along with John Fund, he is the co-author of “Who’s Counting? [read post]
23 May 2017, 1:06 am
Impression had not sought permission to resell the cartridges in the US, and Lexmark subsequently took the company to court for patent infringement.Under 35 USC section 271, only the patent holder is authorized to sell and import patented inventions in the US. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:27 pm
The Full Court upheld the first instance decision of Justice Nicholas and clarified that an application by a generic for PBS listing does not, of itself, infringe a patent. [read post]
18 May 2017, 8:37 am
So what does this all mean? [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:30 pm
Significantly, the schedule does not include limitation periods imposed pursuant to federal statutes and also does not include limitation periods arising from the statutes that are referred to in section 2(1) of the Limitations Act, 2002. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
And a John Doe place-holder filing wouldn’t work here, because to do that, the person must be described with sufficient particularity to be served with the complaint. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
9 May 2017, 6:20 am
The Constitution generally does not protect noncitizens abroad who have no previous ties to the United States. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
On December 31, 2014, Judge John Gleeson issued a Memorandum and Order (the “Order”) remanding Nelson’s case to the Commissioner for the calculation and award of benefits. [read post]
