Search for: "Johns v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 11,459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:40 pm
—John Erskine 1Castro v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 1:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
United States, 45 Harv. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:46 am
United States, which entails a legal issue that was the subject of the 2023 Gibbons Criminal Procedure Moot Court Competition, where my partner, Gaby Pinzon, and I represented the University of Miami School of Law in winning First Place at the competition. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:01 am
Professor Andrew Bond denounced the United States as a “sh*t nation” and then invited conservatives to quote him. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But it has often played a similar role in historical writing on the United States after the Revolution, and especially in historical writing on federalism. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:19 pm
In my earlier post, I mentioned this passage reminded me of United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
It contributes to the creation and promotion of states’ national identity[20]. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
From Basulto v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
If we assume that utility functions yield values expressed in units of utility or utiles, then individual's utility function might score state of affairs P at 80 utiles and state of affairs Q at 120 utiles. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 12:07 am
The ET had erred in its approach because it had failed to engage with the question identified in Eweida and Ors v United Kingdom (2013) 57 EHRR 8; had it done so, it would have concluded that there was a close or direct nexus between her Facebook posts and her protected beliefs. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
John v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 5:47 pm
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that noroviruses cause nearly 21 million cases of acute gastroenteritis annually, making noroviruses the leading cause of gastroenteritis in adults in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 2:02 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
The book points out that neither the Federalist nor other early commentaries used the word “interposition” and that the term did not even surface in state protests against Chisholm v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 3:20 pm
Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
