Search for: "Johnson v. State Of Florida" Results 541 - 560 of 865
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm by Henry Miller
In announcing the plan, Johnson stated that COVID-19 “restrictions pose a heavy toll” on the country and England did “not need to pay that cost any longer. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am by Kent Scheidegger
Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989) gave Lockett a broad reading, but Johnson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Florida, 14-7505, a twice-relisted capital case involving a murder in a Florida Popeye’s. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
In this opinion, the Florida Supreme Courtindicated that a motion for rehearing would not be allowed.4Mr. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:13 pm by Colin O'Keefe
 Scott Johnson of PCT Law Group on the firm's Virginia Business Law Update Jared Loughner Facing Federal and State Death Penalty Charges: Indigent Defense Appointments Made for Death Qualified Counsel - Criminal law lawyer Terry Lenamon blog on his blog, Terry Lenamon on the Death Penalty Green Roof Benefits and Risks: Music City Center in Nashville May Have Both - Construction attorney Matt DeVries of the Best Practices Construction Law Blog … [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Frances G. Zacher
A preparer of food “has the duty of ordinary care to eliminate or remove in the preparation of the food he serves such harmful substances as the consumer of the food, as served, would not ordinarily anticipate and guard against,” the Florida Court of Appeals said in Zabner v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-9261, for Florida v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Many states have legal rules that call for religious exemptions from generally applicable state and local laws.[49] Some such rules are enacted by statute, using so-called “Religious Freedom Restoration Acts. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Prelesnik, No. 072522 In conviction for second degree murder, grant of writ of habeas corpus for ineffective counsel is affirmed where: 1) potential alibi witnesses coupled with an otherwise weak case rendered the failure to investigate the testimony sufficient to "undermine confidence" in the outcome of the jury verdict; and 2) the state appellate court's application of Strickland v. [read post]