Search for: "Jones v. Jones (Complete Opinion)" Results 541 - 560 of 587
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
State, 885 So.2d 338 (Fla. 2004) .................5, 15 Jones v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 5:42 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (8): State of Indiana v. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:39 am
" Bush, slip op. at 3.In counterpoint to CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Studies using polygraph examinations to elicit disclosures have found that sex offenders have often committed sex crimes that went undisclosed and were never reported to police or child protection agencies (Ahlmeyer, Heil, McKee, & English, 2000; English, Jones, Pasini-Hill, Patrick, & Cooley-Towell, 2000; Heil, Ahlmeyer, & Simons, 2003). [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Cannon to right of them, Cannon to left of them, Cannon in front of them Volley’d & thunder’d; Storm’d at with shot and shell, Boldly they rode and well, Into the jaws of Death, Into the mouth of Hell Rode the six hundred [Blawg Review 141 was published slightly early after email exchange between myself and Ed of Blawg Review] Welcome Bienvenu Wilkommen Benvenuto Bienvenido to Blawg Review 141. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 5:25 am
 That, in our opinion, would prove to be a completely unworkable standard.To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: 3657 Realty Co., LC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:06 pm
The FBI agent also had brought a "Consent to Assume Online Presence" form and Jones wound up signing that, too:[Agent] White and [Jones] completed the `Consent To Assume Online Presence' form. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 8:45 am
  This Jones opinion was likely completed last week; it does not mention Gall, though Jones now seems sounder in the wake of the Supreme Court's repeated assertion that reasonableness review should be highly deferential. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 1:36 am
Read this passage from this recent Anita Lee story about the Jones v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 5:20 am
Plaintiff cites to a number of other unpublished cases, but has failed to attach copies of the opinions. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Tsekhanovich, No. 05-4809"Conviction and sentence for false statements, mail fraud, and health care fraud-related charges is affirmed where the district court did not exceed its allowable discretion by admitting challenged testimony, as the government demonstrated that the lay opinion testimony was sufficiently based on and rationally derived from the witness's first-hand perceptions. [read post]