Search for: "Judge v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 80,869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Intrusion upon seclusion claim: The court referred to Jones v Tsige and stated that the tort required intentional intrusion upon the seclusion of another of his private affairs. [read post]
9 May 2024, 6:05 am by Adam Klasfeld
Weinstein also chose not to testify after the judge granted prosecutors permission to cross-examine him about a wide range of uncharged conduct, in rulings that gave the state’s highest court pause. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:00 pm
Without dissent (and even with Judge Bumatay on the panel). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am by jonathanturley
In comparison, Daniels may be the only authentic part of the entire case in New York v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am by Benson Varghese
Potential defendants under 1983 include police officers, prison guards, judges, public officials, and even private individuals acting on behalf of the state or local government. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am by Benson Varghese
Potential defendants under 1983 include police officers, prison guards, judges, public officials, and even private individuals acting on behalf of the state or local government. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:22 am by Benson Varghese
Potential defendants under 1983 include police officers, prison guards, judges, public officials, and even private individuals acting on behalf of the state or local government. [read post]
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]