Search for: "Just v. Chambers" Results 541 - 560 of 2,586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 3:51 am by SHG
Because it violated the trust of chambers. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 3:29 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Patrick Bannon Last week, Oxford Health Plans filed its opening brief with the Supreme Court in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:05 am by Astrid Reisinger Coracini
Applying Yerodia, the Appeals Chamber of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (“SCSL”) ruled in its Decision on Immunity from Jurisdiction, Prosecutor v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 7:27 am by Giles Peaker
Spencer Turner Pupil Barrister 5 Pump Court Chambers The post Breaching licensing and proceeds of crime by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 6:35 am by Adam Wagner
Whether it applies outside of UK territory is a whole other question, and one for which we may have a new answer when the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights gives judgment in the case of Al-Skeini and others v. the United Kingdom & Al-Jedda v. the United Kingdom next week. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 9:27 am by chief
Now, thanks to a note on the Landmark Chambers website,* we know that the Supreme Court has granted permission to consider whether this is correct. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by familoo
Just as news arrives of a new FDAC (that’s Family Drug and Alcohol Court to the uninitiated) in Gloucester so we hear less welcome news of the planned closure of Wells Street. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:40 am by azatty
  Most recently, last December, Mary argued before the nation’s highest court the case of Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:00 am by Jeffrey Kahn
On May 23, two distinguished Queen’s Counsel squared off before a Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in a rare inter-state case on the court’s docket, Georgia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 10:24 am
  But now we wonder about one of the two defense victories -- the one about punitive damages, Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:40 am by Lyle Denniston
At issue in the case of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am by S S
The claimants argued that, reliant on M v Newham [2020] EWHC 32, the duty was immediate, unqualified and non-deferrable. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
In the case of R (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police ([2020] EWCA Civ 1058) the Court of Appeal held that the live automated facial recognition technology (“AFR”) used by the South Wales Police Force (“SWP”) was unlawful as it was not “in accordance with law” for the purposes of Article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]